SupremeToday Landscape Ad
Back
Next
Judicial Analysis Court Copy Headnote Facts Arguments Court observation
judgment-img

1988 Supreme(Kar) 552

M.RAMAKRISHNA, P.P.BOPANNA
Balaji Textile Mills Pvt. Ltd. – Appellant
Versus
Ashok Kavle – Respondent


JUDGMENT

Bopanna, J.—This appeal arises against the order of the learned company judge in Company Petition No. 8 of 1982, on a preliminary objection raised by the appellants based on the provisions of section 41 of the Companies Act, 1956 (for short "the Act"). The parties are referred to in this appeal by the position assigned to them in the company petition.

2. The petitioners who are shareholders of respondent No. 1-company had filed a petition under the provisions of sections 397 and 398 of the Act against respondent No. 1, the company had respondent No. 2, the ex-director of the first respondent-company. The Registrar of Companies and also the chartered accountants, Messrs M. R. Narayan and Company, were arrayed as respondents Nos. 3 and 4 in view of certain allegation made against them by the petitioners. It is not necessary to go into the various acts of oppression and mismanagement alleged by the petitioners in the company petition since they are not the subject-matter for consideration in this appeal.

3. In the statement of objections filed by the respondents, a plea was taken that the petition is not maintainable in view of the fact that the membership of the petitioners i











































































Click Here to Read the rest of this document
1
2
3
4
5
6
7
8
9
10
11
SupremeToday Portrait Ad
supreme today icon
logo-black

An indispensable Tool for Legal Professionals, Endorsed by Various High Court and Judicial Officers

Please visit our Training & Support
Center or Contact Us for assistance

qr

Scan Me!

India’s Legal research and Law Firm App, Download now!

For Daily Legal Updates, Join us on :

whatsapp-icon telegram-icon
whatsapp-icon Back to top