SupremeToday Landscape Ad
Back
Next
Judicial Analysis Court Copy Headnote Facts Arguments Court observation
judgment-img

1964 Supreme(Kar) 122

T.K.TUKOL
Duggamma – Appellant
Versus
Ganeshayya – Respondent


JUDGMENT

(1) This appeal raises an important question under Section 13 of the Code of Civil Procedure as regards the effect of a foreign judgment on a subsequent suit based on the same original cause of action between the same parties in respect of some other properties.

(2) There is no dispute about the facts relevant to the appeal between the parties. The land in dispute were of the ownership of one Ishwar, son of Ganapiah, who died on 19-1-1945 without leaving any direct heirs behind him. The lands are situated at Manvalli in Siddapur Taluka of North Canara District. Respondent No. 1 institutes O.S. 44/56 in the Court of the Civil Judge, Junior Division, Sirsi on 7-6-1956, for a declaration that he was the nearest heir to the deceased Ishwar and for possession and other consequential relief's against the appellants and other respondents. The plaintiff claimed to be the father's sister's son of deceased Ishwar while the appellant claimed to be the mother's mother of Ishwar. Ishwar owned some immovable property at Talava in Sagar Taluka of Shimoga District which formed part of the princely state of Mysore. In respect of that property the plaintiff instituted O.S. 268 of 46-47 in the





































Click Here to Read the rest of this document
1
2
3
4
5
6
7
8
9
10
11
SupremeToday Portrait Ad
supreme today icon
logo-black

An indispensable Tool for Legal Professionals, Endorsed by Various High Court and Judicial Officers

Please visit our Training & Support
Center or Contact Us for assistance

qr

Scan Me!

India’s Legal research and Law Firm App, Download now!

For Daily Legal Updates, Join us on :

whatsapp-icon telegram-icon
whatsapp-icon Back to top