SupremeToday Landscape Ad
Back
Next
Judicial Analysis Court Copy Headnote Facts Arguments Court observation
judgment-img

1964 Supreme(Kar) 126

A.R.SOMNATH AYYAR, B.M.KALAGATE
Nandappa Paramanna – Appellant
Versus
Shidgouda Ningappa – Respondent


Advocates:
Advocate appeared:
Mr. K.S. Gavanur, for the Appellant
Mr. N.H. Naik, V.S. Kalimath, for the Respondent

JUDGMENT

Somnath Iyer, J.—This is a plaintiff's appeal and is directed against that part of the decree of the Civil Judge by which his suit for the recovery of possession of two items of land alienated to defendant 3 was dismissed.

2. The relationship between the parties is displayed by the following pedigree.

KALLAPPA

(Original ancestor)

|

____________________________________________________________

| | |

Maddeppa-Gangawwa. Sadashivappa Paramanna-Babakka.

| |

_____________________________________

| | adopte






























Click Here to Read the rest of this document

1
2
3
4
5
6
7
8
9
10
11
SupremeToday Portrait Ad
supreme today icon
logo-black

An indispensable Tool for Legal Professionals, Endorsed by Various High Court and Judicial Officers

Please visit our Training & Support
Center or Contact Us for assistance

qr

Scan Me!

India’s Legal research and Law Firm App, Download now!

For Daily Legal Updates, Join us on :

whatsapp-icon telegram-icon
whatsapp-icon Back to top