SupremeToday Landscape Ad
Back
Next
Judicial Analysis Court Copy Headnote Facts Arguments Court observation
Listen Audio Icon Pause Audio Icon
judgment-img

1966 Supreme(Kar) 168

A.R.SOMNATH AYYAR, B.M.KALAGATE
Subba Rao (S. ) – Appellant
Versus
State of Mysore – Respondent


JUDGMENT

Somnath Ayyar, J.—It is indisputable that during the pendency of this writ petition, the petitioner reached the age of superannuation.

2. That being so, under the provisions of rule 95 of the Mysore Civil Services Rules, the petitioner has retired from Government service and the pending disciplinary proceeding cannot, therefore, continue.

3. Sri Venkataramayya, the Special Government Pleader, points out that by an Order made by Government on 13 November 1963, it was declared that the petitioner shall be deemed to have been placed under suspension from the date of the original order of dismissal, and that he shall continue to remain under suspension until further orders or until the date of termination of the enquiry.

4. But the fact that he was placed under suspension in that way and not even the fact that it was declared that he shall be deemed to have been placed under suspension from the date of the original order of dismissal can arrest the retirement which comes into being on the attainment of the age of superannuation under rule 95. The only contingency in which such retirement does not come into being is when a Government servant is retained in service after the atta



Click Here to Read the rest of this document
1
2
3
4
5
6
7
8
9
10
11
SupremeToday Portrait Ad
supreme today icon
logo-black

An indispensable Tool for Legal Professionals, Endorsed by Various High Court and Judicial Officers

Please visit our Training & Support
Center or Contact Us for assistance

qr

Scan Me!

India’s Legal research and Law Firm App, Download now!

For Daily Legal Updates, Join us on :

whatsapp-icon telegram-icon
whatsapp-icon Back to top