SupremeToday Landscape Ad
Back
Next
Judicial Analysis Court Copy Headnote Facts Arguments Court observation
judgment-img

2010 Supreme(Kar) 1307

A.S.PACHHAPURE
J. Emmars – Appellant
Versus
Perfect Industries and Products – Respondent


JUDGMENT

A. S. Pachhapure , J.—The appellant has challenged the Judgment and Order of the Court below, granting acquittal of the respondents for the charge under Section 138 of the Negotiable Instruments Act [hereinafter called as â‚Å“The Actâ‚ for short].

2. The facts relevant for the purpose of this appeal are as under:

The appellant submitted a complaint before the trial Court stating that towards discharge of the liability due and payable, the respondents issued a cheque bearing No. 146532 dated 15.07.2003 for a sum of Rs. 6,00,000-00 drawn on Central Bank, Bangalore, in the name of the appellant with a premise that on presentation of the said cheque on the due date, the same will be honoured. The presentation of the cheque was postponed on number of occasions on the request of the respondents and finally, when the appellant presented/that cheque through the banker i.e., the Syndicate Bank, Shanthinagar, Bangalore, it returned with an endorsement as accounts closed.

The cheque was signed by the respondents 2 and 3 on behalf of respondent No. l, which is a firm and respondent No. 2 is the Managing Partner and respondent No.3 is the partner of the 1st respondent firm. Thus, the ap



















Click Here to Read the rest of this document
1
2
3
4
5
6
7
8
9
10
11
SupremeToday Portrait Ad
supreme today icon
logo-black

An indispensable Tool for Legal Professionals, Endorsed by Various High Court and Judicial Officers

Please visit our Training & Support
Center or Contact Us for assistance

qr

Scan Me!

India’s Legal research and Law Firm App, Download now!

For Daily Legal Updates, Join us on :

whatsapp-icon telegram-icon
whatsapp-icon Back to top