B.S. PATIL, J.-This revision petition is filed under Section 46 of the Karnataka Rent Act, 1999 (for short, 'the Act') challenging the order dated 04.02.2013 passed by the learned III Addl. Senior Civil Judge, Bangalore in HRC No. 121/2011, directing eviction of the petitioners from the petition premises within 60 days from the date of the order.

2. The facts that are not in dispute are, that the petition schedule premises belongs to one P.V. Subramania Iyer-father of respondents 1 to 6 herein. He had let out the same to one Suvalal Jain-husband of petitioner No. 2 and father of petitioners 1 & 7. According to the respondent-owners, the premises was let out about 50 years back by P.V. Subramania Iyer, who died on 18.10.1985 leaving behind the petitioners before the Court below as his legal representatives. It is also relevant to notice here that earlier HRC No. 338/2009 had been filed by respondents 1 to 6 herein against Suvalal Jain. In the said petition, eviction order was passed. However, at the stage of execution, objection was raised by the heirs of the original tenant-Suvalal Jain contending that when the order of eviction was passed, Suvalal Jain was not alive and theref