SupremeToday Landscape Ad
Back
Next
Judicial Analysis Court Copy Headnote Facts Arguments Court observation
judgment-img

2013 Supreme(Kar) 977

ANAND BYRAREDDY
SANTHOSH S/O MARUTHI – Appellant
Versus
STATE OF KARNATAKA – Respondent


Advocates:
Advocate Appeared:
B.C. Muddappa, for the Appellant
S.S. Aspalli, Government Pleader, for the Respondent

JUDGMENT

ANAND BYRAREDDY, J.-Heard th learned Counsel for the appellant and the learned Government Pleader for the respondent.

2. The appellant is in appeal challenging the judgment of the Court below, whereby the appellant has been convicted for the offences punishable under Sections 304B, 498A and 306 of the Indian Penal Code, 1860 (Hereinafter referred to as the 'IPC', for brevity) and Sections 3 and 4 of the Dowry Prohibition Act, 1961 (Hereinafter referred to as the 'DP Act', for brevity).

3. The trial Court has convicted the accused-appellant to undergo rigorous imprisonment for a period of 7 years for the offence punishable under Section 304B of the IPC; rigorous imprisonment for a period of 2 years for the offence punishable under Section 306 of the IPC and to pay a fine of Rs. 1,000/-; rigorous imprisonment for a period of 2 years and to pay a fine of Rs. 1,000/- for the offence punishable under Section 498A of the IPC and to pay a fine of Rs. 1,000/-; rigorous imprisonment for a period of 3 years and to pay a fine of Rs. 15,000/- for the offence punishable under Section 3 of the DP Act and rigorous imprisonment for a period of 6 months and to pay a fine of Rs. 10,000/- for t

















Click Here to Read the rest of this document

1
2
3
4
5
6
7
8
9
10
11
SupremeToday Portrait Ad
supreme today icon
logo-black

An indispensable Tool for Legal Professionals, Endorsed by Various High Court and Judicial Officers

Please visit our Training & Support
Center or Contact Us for assistance

qr

Scan Me!

India’s Legal research and Law Firm App, Download now!

For Daily Legal Updates, Join us on :

whatsapp-icon telegram-icon
whatsapp-icon Back to top