SupremeToday Landscape Ad
Back
Next
Judicial Analysis Court Copy Headnote Facts Arguments Court observation
Listen Audio Icon Pause Audio Icon
judgment-img

2009 Supreme(Kar) 960

IN THE HIGH COURT OF KARNATAKA AT BANGALORE
P.D. Dinakaran and V.G. Sabhahit, JJ.
Mineral Sales Private Limited (MSPL), Hospet —Appellant
Vs.
State of Karnataka and others —Respondent
Writ Petition No. 60023 of 2009
Decided on : 01-04-2009

Advocates:
Advocate Appeared:
Mr. Krishnan Venugopal, M.M. Swamy, for the Appellant
Mr. Udaya Holla, Advocate General, for the Respondent

Headnote:KARNATAKA FOREST ACT, 1963 - Sections 24 & 82 & Forest (Conservation) Act, 1980, Section 2 [P.D. Dinakaran, C.J.& V.G. Sabhahit, J] Petitioner a lessee under mining lease for mining iron ore - Petitioner entered into an agreement with Deputy Conservation of Forests - Allegation against petitioner-company on basis of surveyor report that it has dumped static dump out of their leased area - Encroachment of forest land proved - FIR registered against petitioner - Accordingly, Deputy conservator of Forests, 4th respondent invoking condition No. 23 of agreement and section 82 of Karnataka Forest Act, 1963 suspended mining license - Aggrieved by this petitioner seeking to quash impugned order passed by 4th respondent and FIR registered against him - Held, The power of judicial review under Article 226 of the Constitution of India is akin to the inherent power conferred under Section 482 of the Code of to Criminal Procedure, 1973. It is a settled law that even though such inherent powers conferred on the High Court are very wide, the very plenitude of the power requires great caution in its exercise and the Courts must be very careful to see that its decision in exercise of such inherent power is based on sound principles as held by the Apex Court in the case of Inder Mohan Goswami and Another v State of Uttaranchal and ors. [AIR 2008 SC 251; 2007 (12) SCC 1], because the inherent powers conferred on this Court has to be sparingly exercised (i) to give effect to an order under the Code; (ii) to prevent abuse of process of Court; and (iii) to otherwise secure the ends of justice, but in any event not to encourage violations of the provisions of any statutes in force much any conditions of agreement there under which empowers the Competent Authority to take appropriate action against the law breakers and those who violate the conditions of agreement. In any event, such powers should not be exercised to stifle a legitimate prosecution and therefore the courts should refrain from giving a prima facie decision in a case where the entire facts are incomplete and hazy, more so, when the evidence has not been collected and produced before the Court. In the instant case, the Advocate General comes forward to substantiate the complaint made against the petitioner as to the violation of the conditions of agreement dated 19th April, 2007. Therefore, when the evidence is yet to be collected and produced before the Court and the respondents are prepared to substantiate the violation of conditions by the petitioner, it may not be proper for this Court to use the inherent power to stifle the legitimate prosecution nor to give a prima facie decision hastily. Hence, it may not be proper for Court to quash the FIR at this stage. Petition rejected.

       MINES AND MINERALS (REGULATION AND DEVELOPMENT) ACT, 1957 - Section 4-A & Forest Conversation Act (69 of 1980), Section 2 & Karnataka Forest Act (5 of 1964), Section 24: [P.D. Dinakaran, C.J & V.G. Sabhahit, J] Suspension of mining lease in forest area for alleged violation of agreement conditions -Leased out areas of petitioner itself is yet to be identified and demarcated - Civil litigations pending in this regard between petitioner and neighbouring mining operators - Enforceability of condition of agreement had become difficult - Held, It would not be proper to suspend mining operation without ample material to substantiate violation of condition. That would be an arbitrary and unreasonable exercise of power and will also amount to violation of principle of natural justice.

JUDGMENT

P.D. Dinakaran, C.J.— The petitioner, a company incorporated under the Companies Act, 1956 is a lessee under the current mining lease for mining iron ore (ML No. 2416) over an extent of 350.78 hectares. Out of 350.78 hectares covering Sy. Nos. 1, 4, 5 and 6 of Vyasanakere Village. Hospet Taluk, Bellary District, an extent of 347.22 hectares was leased out for mining activities and the remaining 3.56 hectares was demarcated for road.

1.2 The said mining lease was granted originally in the year 1952 by the then Government of Madras for 10 years to one K Narayanaiah and subsequently transferred in favour of the petitioner herein in the year 1962 and got renewed for 20 years each time with effect from 14-11-1962, 14-11-1982 and 14-11-2002. The petitioner, admittedly obtained clearance from the concerned forest authorities as contemplated under Section 2 of the Forest (Conservation) Act, 1980 vide the proceedings dated 8-3-2007 of the Government of India and the Government of Karnataka has also accorded approval for the lease by proceedings dated 23-3-2007.

1.3 With this background, the petitioner entered into an agreement dated 19-4-2007 with the Deputy Conservator of Forests, Bellary Division, Bellary representing the Government of Karnataka, viz., the fourth respondent, and the relevant clauses of the agreement are extracted hereunder:

...

4. Fencing, protection and regeneration of the safety zone area (7.5 metres strip all along the outer boundary of the mining lease area) shall be done at the project cost. Besides this, afforestation on degraded forest land, to be selected elsewhere, measuring one and a half times the area under safety zone, shall also be done at the project cost.

...

8. The user agency shall take up planting work on the static dumps during the advance mining operations.

9. No damages to the flora and fauna of the area shall be caused.

...

12. The mining lease area shall be demarcated on ground at the project cost, using four feet high RCC pillars, with each pillar inscribed with the serial number, forward and backward bearings and distance between two adjacent pillars.

13. The forest land shall not be used for any purpose other than that specified in the proposal

...

18. The lessee shall undertake to protect rigidly the leased area and forest area surrounding the area upto one km. from the leased area.

...

23. In case of violation of agreement conditions, the State Government (Department of Forest, Ecology and Environment) shall have right to suspend the mining activities.

1.4 While approving the scheme of mining by proceedings dated 30-4-2007, the Controller of Mines (SZ), Indian Bureau of Mines, Bangalore under the control of Department of Mines, Central Government, has imposed the condition that the petitioner shall dump the overburden waste only within an area of 37.32 hectares during 2006-07; within an area of 40.15 hectares during the next 5 years ending on 31-3-2012 and the same shall not be extended during the rest of the periods.

2.1 When the petitioner was mining thus, the fourth respondent-Deputy Conservator of Forests, Bellary Division, by proceedings dated 29-12-2008, which is impugned in the present writ petition, referring to the letter of the Assistant Conservator of Forests dated 15-12-2008 and the letter of the Range Forest Officer, Hospet, even dated, observed that:

1. The user agency M/s. Mineral Sales Private Limited, Hospet not properly marked their leased mining area, upto the border mark fixed area not installed the prescribed concrete poles for every 20 meters distance and not marked number on the poles, not mentioned forward and backward bearing, as it is safety zone area, therefore unable to identify 7.5 meters measurement script and border gunta, it is violation of Condition Nos. 4 and 12 of the agreement;

2. The user agency in Vyasanakere forest area during its mining activities to dump the waste produce of mining materials shown 24.75 hectare area out of the sanctioned area. But during spo













































Click Here to Read the rest of this document

1
2
3
4
5
6
7
8
9
10
11
SupremeToday Portrait Ad
supreme today icon
logo-black

An indispensable Tool for Legal Professionals, Endorsed by Various High Court and Judicial Officers

Please visit our Training & Support
Center or Contact Us for assistance

qr

Scan Me!

India’s Legal research and Law Firm App, Download now!

For Daily Legal Updates, Join us on :

whatsapp-icon telegram-icon
whatsapp-icon Back to top