SupremeToday Landscape Ad
Back
Next
Judicial Analysis Court Copy Headnote Facts Arguments Court observation
judgment-img

1986 Supreme(Kar) 449

K.JAGANNATHA SHETTY, MOHAMMAD SHARIF, N.D.VENKATESH
Commissioner of Income Tax – Appellant
Versus
L. N. Horkeri – Respondent


Advocates:
Advocate appeared:
Mr. K. Srinivasan, for the Appellant

JUDGMENT

K. Jagannatha Shetty, Actg. C.J.—This is a reference under section 256(1) of the Income Tax Act, 1961. The question referred is as under :

"Whether, on the facts and in the circumstances of the case, the Appellate Tribunal was justified in law in confirming the Appellate Assistant Commissioner's order who has held that share income of the minor children cannot be clubbed in the hands of the assessee under section 64 of the Income Tax Act as there was no income assessable in the status of an individual apart from the share income of the minors ?"

2. The assessee is an individual. He has two minor sons who were admitted to the benefits of the partnership in a firm called M/s. Channabasaveshwara Trading Co. He had no separate income of his own. He, therefore, did not include in his return the share income of the minor sons accrued to them from the firm. The Income Tax Officer thought that it was illegal to exclude the minor's income. He assessed the share income of the two minors in the hands of the assessee as required under section 64(1)(iii) of the Income Tax Act.

3. The assessee preferred an appeal challenging the order of assessment before the Appellate Assistant Commissi














Click Here to Read the rest of this document

1
2
3
4
5
6
7
8
9
10
11
SupremeToday Portrait Ad
supreme today icon
logo-black

An indispensable Tool for Legal Professionals, Endorsed by Various High Court and Judicial Officers

Please visit our Training & Support
Center or Contact Us for assistance

qr

Scan Me!

India’s Legal research and Law Firm App, Download now!

For Daily Legal Updates, Join us on :

whatsapp-icon telegram-icon
whatsapp-icon Back to top