SupremeToday Landscape Ad
Back
Next
Judicial Analysis Court Copy Headnote Facts Arguments Court observation
Listen Audio Icon Pause Audio Icon
judgment-img

2009 Supreme(Kar) 1005

V.G.SABHAHIT, S.N.SATYANARAYANA
Commissioner of Income Tax – Appellant
Versus
Pranam Metals – Respondent


Advocates:
Advocate Appeared:
Mr. M.V. Seshachala, for the Appellant

JUDGMENT

V.G. Sabhahit, J.—This appeal by the Revenue is filed being aggrieved by the order passed by the Income Tax Appellate Tribunal, Panaji Bench, Panaji in I. T. A. No. 34/PANJ/2006 wherein the Tribunal has allowed the appeal filed by the assessee and set aside the penalty imposed upon the assessee under Section 271(1)(c) of the Income Tax Act, 1961 (hereinafter referred to as "the Act").

2. The assessee which is a partnership firm filed returns during the year 1997-98 showing sale of Rs. 4,00,000 to M/s. Rajesh Industries and on assessment it was found that the sale of Rs. 4,00,000 to M/s. Rajesh Industries was shown in the return. However, in the closing stock of M/s. Rajesh Industries these goods were not shown. Under the circumstances, assessment order was passed considering the sale of Rs. 4,00,000 as bogus and made addition which was confirmed. Being aggrieved by the same, the assessee preferred an appeal before the Commissioner of Income Tax (Appeals), Belgaum and the appellate authority by order dated November 21, 2005 confirmed the order of the Assessing Officer. Being aggrieved by the same the assessee preferred an appeal before the Income Tax Appellate Tribunal, Panaj






Click Here to Read the rest of this document

1
2
3
4
5
6
7
8
9
10
11
SupremeToday Portrait Ad
supreme today icon
logo-black

An indispensable Tool for Legal Professionals, Endorsed by Various High Court and Judicial Officers

Please visit our Training & Support
Center or Contact Us for assistance

qr

Scan Me!

India’s Legal research and Law Firm App, Download now!

For Daily Legal Updates, Join us on :

whatsapp-icon telegram-icon
whatsapp-icon Back to top