SupremeToday Landscape Ad
Back
Next
Judicial Analysis Court Copy Headnote Facts Arguments Court observation
Listen Audio Icon Pause Audio Icon
judgment-img

2015 Supreme(Kar) 605

K.N.PHANEENDRA
EKNATH – Appellant
Versus
ROOPA – Respondent


Advocates Appeared:
For the Petitioner: SRI. S.S. YADRAMI, ADV.
For the Respondent: SRI.PAVAN B. DODDATTI, ADV

ORDER :

The petitioner-husband has approached this Court calling in question the order passed by the Family Court, Belagavi, in Civil Misc. No.2 of 2013 dated 12/03/2015 wherein the Family Court has allowed the petition filed under Order IX Rule 13 read with Section 151 of the Code of Civil Procedure by setting aside its earlier exparte judgment and decree dated 14/06/2012 passed in M.C.No.58 of 2012.

2. Upon issuance of notice, the respondent has appeared through his counsel.

3. Sri. S.S. Yadrami, learned counsel for the petitioner strenuously contends before the Court that in view of Section 19 of the Family Courts Act, any order on facts or law passed by the Family Court is appealable and no other provision is made for invoking the provisions under the Code of Civil Procedure under Order IX Rule 13 for restoration of petition already disposed of by the Family Court. He, further, submits that Order IX Rule 13 of the CPC is not applicable in view of Section 19 of the Family Courts Act. Consequently, he also contended that after obtaining a decree for divorce, the petitioner has remarried and therefore, when the order has already been accomplished, the question of restoration of the s
















Click Here to Read the rest of this document

1
2
3
4
5
6
7
8
9
10
11
SupremeToday Portrait Ad
supreme today icon
logo-black

An indispensable Tool for Legal Professionals, Endorsed by Various High Court and Judicial Officers

Please visit our Training & Support
Center or Contact Us for assistance

qr

Scan Me!

India’s Legal research and Law Firm App, Download now!

For Daily Legal Updates, Join us on :

whatsapp-icon telegram-icon
whatsapp-icon Back to top