SupremeToday Landscape Ad
Back
Next
Judicial Analysis Court Copy Headnote Facts Arguments Court observation
judgment-img

2015 Supreme(Kar) 762

SUBHRO KAMAL MUKHERJEE, B.V.NAGARATHNA
M. VEERABHADRAIAH – Appellant
Versus
UNION OF INDIA – Respondent


Advocates:
ADVOCATE APPEARED:
SRI. N.DEVHADASS, SENIOR COUNSEL FOR SRI. M.R. RAJAGOPAL, ADVOCATE
SRI. KRISHNA S DIXIT, ASSISTANT SOLICITOR GENERAL FOR R1;
SRI. R. DEVDAS, PRINCIPAL GOVERNMENT ADVOCATE FOR R2;
SRI. UDAYA HOLLA, SENIOR COUNSEL FOR SRI. VIVEK HOLLA, ADVOCATE FOR R3;
SMT. GEETHA DEVI .M.P, ADVOCATE FOR R4; R5 SERVED;
SRI. S.S. NAGANAND, SENIOR ADVOCATE FOR SRI. S.SRIRANGA, ADVOCATE FOR R6; SRI. NANJUNDA REDDY.D.N., SENIOR ADVOCATE FOR SRI. MANU KULKARNI, ADVOCATE FOR R7;
MRS. B.V. NIDHISHREE, ADVOCATE FOR R8;
SRI. BIPIN HEGDE, ADVOCATE FOR R9 & R17;
SRI. POONAM PATIL, ADVOCATE FOR R10;
SRI. D.L.N. RAO, SENIOR ADVOCATE FOR SRI. M. KRISHNAPPA, ADVOCATE FOR R11;
SRI. D.R. RAVISHANKAR, ADVOCATE FOR R12;
SRI. A. SHIVARAM, ADVOCATE FOR R13;
SRI. ASHOK HARANAHALLI, SENIOR ADVOCATE FOR MANMOHAN P.N., ADVOCATE FOR R16 & R19;
SRI. K. ARUN KUMAR, ADVOCATE FOR R21;
SRI. ARAVIND V. CHAVAN, ADVOCATE FOR R18;
SRI. L. GOVINDARAJU, ADVOCATE FOR R20;
SRI. LOHITASWA BANAKAR, ADVOCATE FOR R14;
R15 SERVED

ORDER :

“The profession of law, said Justice McCardie, has two aspects. It may be regarded as a pursuit which yields, if success be gained, a reward of fees and emoluments. But it may also be looked upon as a vocation which offers the joy of intellectual achievement, which claims the allegiance of unswerving honour, which asks for the guardianship of high tradition, and which affords a wide field for loyal and generous service to the community.” (Source: “Lawyers in the Dock”, “Nani Palkhivala Selected Writings” Edited by L.M. Singhvi, M.R.Pai, S.Ramakrishnan) These writ petitions are filed in public interest. They have been filed by two learned advocates, practicing in this Court, as petitioners, assailing notifications dated 30/06/2014 and 14/07/2014 issued by the respondent-Registrar General, High Court of Karnataka, Bengaluru, by which, the private respondent-advocates have been designated as senior advocates under Section 16 of the advocates Act, 1961 (hereinafter, referred to as “the Act”). A direction is also sought to frame rules for designation of senior advocates under subsec































































































































































Click Here to Read the rest of this document

1
2
3
4
5
6
7
8
9
10
11
SupremeToday Portrait Ad
supreme today icon
logo-black

An indispensable Tool for Legal Professionals, Endorsed by Various High Court and Judicial Officers

Please visit our Training & Support
Center or Contact Us for assistance

qr

Scan Me!

India’s Legal research and Law Firm App, Download now!

For Daily Legal Updates, Join us on :

whatsapp-icon telegram-icon
whatsapp-icon Back to top