SupremeToday Landscape Ad
Back
Next
Judicial Analysis Court Copy Headnote Facts Arguments Court observation
Listen Audio Icon Pause Audio Icon
judgment-img

2015 Supreme(Kar) 1160

S.SUJATHA
Narayana Reddy – Appellant
Versus
Manjunath – Respondent


ORDER :

Heard the learned counsel for the parties.

2. This writ petition is directed against the order passed by the Fast Track Court, Devanahalli, on IA No. 4 in OS No. 271/2009.

3. The facts in brief are that the 1st respondent and his father had entered into a sale agreement on 15-3-2007, with the petitioner agreeing to sell the land in Sy. No. 70/2 measuring 1 acre 10 guntas of Chikkajal village, Jala Bobli, Bengaluru North Taluk, for a total sale consideration of Rs. 45 lakhs, out of which the 1st respondent and his father received a sum of Rs. 8,20,000/- as advance. It transpires on 12-5-2007, the petitioner paid further advance of Rs. 25,000/- to the 1st respondent and that on 25-3-2009, the petitioner issued legal notice to respondent Nos. 1 and 2 demanding them to come and execute valid registered sale deed by receiving the balance sale consideration, though served with the legal notice, they had not complied with same. The petitioner was compelled to file the suit in OS No. 271/2009 against respondent Nos. 1 and 2 for the relief of specific performance of the contract and other consequential reliefs in respect of the suit schedule lands on the file of Fast Track Court, Devan
















Click Here to Read the rest of this document
1
2
3
4
5
6
7
8
9
10
11
SupremeToday Portrait Ad
supreme today icon
logo-black

An indispensable Tool for Legal Professionals, Endorsed by Various High Court and Judicial Officers

Please visit our Training & Support
Center or Contact Us for assistance

qr

Scan Me!

India’s Legal research and Law Firm App, Download now!

For Daily Legal Updates, Join us on :

whatsapp-icon telegram-icon
whatsapp-icon Back to top