N.KUMAR
Renuka Manghnani – Appellant
Versus
Peddakka – Respondent
N. Kumar, J.
1. The 7th defendant has filed this writ petition challenging the order passed by the Trial Court on the preliminary issue regarding payment of Court Fee that the suit is properly valued under Section 35(2) of the Karnataka Court Fees and Suits Valuation Act, 1958 (in short, 'the Act') and Court fee of Rs. 200/- paid on the memorandum of plaint is proper. The plaintiff has filed a suit for partition and separate possession and for declaration that the alienation made by the defendants in favour of a School is invalid. In the body of the plaint it is averred that the plaintiff is in joint possession of the plaint schedule property with the defendants. On the contrary, the School has filed detailed written statement and also produced photographs to show that there is an Engineering College building in the suit property and is not an agricultural land or a vacant land and contends that suit ought to have been valued either under Section 35(1) of the Act or under Section 24 of the Act and ad valorem Court fee should have been paid.
2. The Trial Court after considering the rival contentions was of the view that when in the plaint the plaintiff has specifically pleaded
Login now and unlock free premium legal research
Login to SupremeToday AI and access free legal analysis, AI highlights, and smart tools.
Login
now!
India’s Legal research and Law Firm App, Download now!
Copyright © 2023 Vikas Info Solution Pvt Ltd. All Rights Reserved.