B.MANOHAR
Mallappa – Appellant
Versus
Ningappa – Respondent
B. Manohar, J.
1. The petitioners are defendants 1 to 4 in O.S. No. 390 of 2013 on the file of Civil Judge and Judicial Magistrate First Class, Navalgunda. They have filed this writ petition seeking for quashing the order dated 21-8-2014, rejecting the application filed under Section 151 of Civil Procedure Code, 1908 seeking permission to file the written statement by condoning the delay in filing the written statement. The respondent herein filed a suit seeking for possession of suit property. Defendants 1 to 4 were served with notice on 16-12-2013. However, they did not file the written statement as provided under Order 8, Rule 1 of CPC. After lapse of more than six months, an application was filed seeking condonation of delay and also seeking permission to file written statement. The plaintiff filed objection to the said application contending that, at that belated stage, the written statement filed by the defendant could not be accepted. It was contended by the plaintiff that, as per the provision of Order 8, Rule 1 of CPC, the written statement has to be filed within a period of 30 days after the service of notice, in any case, within an extended period of 90 days. But i
Login now and unlock free premium legal research
Login to SupremeToday AI and access free legal analysis, AI highlights, and smart tools.
Login
now!
India’s Legal research and Law Firm App, Download now!
Copyright © 2023 Vikas Info Solution Pvt Ltd. All Rights Reserved.