SupremeToday Landscape Ad
Back
Next
Judicial Analysis Court Copy Headnote Facts Arguments Court observation
judgment-img

2015 Supreme(Kar) 778

B.MANOHAR
Mallappa – Appellant
Versus
Ningappa – Respondent


Advocates:
Advocate Appeared:
For the Appellant :Sameer G. Kolli, Advocate.
For the Respondents:Girija S. Hiremath, Advocate.

ORDER :

B. Manohar, J.

1. The petitioners are defendants 1 to 4 in O.S. No. 390 of 2013 on the file of Civil Judge and Judicial Magistrate First Class, Navalgunda. They have filed this writ petition seeking for quashing the order dated 21-8-2014, rejecting the application filed under Section 151 of Civil Procedure Code, 1908 seeking permission to file the written statement by condoning the delay in filing the written statement. The respondent herein filed a suit seeking for possession of suit property. Defendants 1 to 4 were served with notice on 16-12-2013. However, they did not file the written statement as provided under Order 8, Rule 1 of CPC. After lapse of more than six months, an application was filed seeking condonation of delay and also seeking permission to file written statement. The plaintiff filed objection to the said application contending that, at that belated stage, the written statement filed by the defendant could not be accepted. It was contended by the plaintiff that, as per the provision of Order 8, Rule 1 of CPC, the written statement has to be filed within a period of 30 days after the service of notice, in any case, within an extended period of 90 days. But i







Click Here to Read the rest of this document

1
2
3
4
5
6
7
8
9
10
11
SupremeToday Portrait Ad
supreme today icon
logo-black

An indispensable Tool for Legal Professionals, Endorsed by Various High Court and Judicial Officers

Please visit our Training & Support
Center or Contact Us for assistance

qr

Scan Me!

India’s Legal research and Law Firm App, Download now!

For Daily Legal Updates, Join us on :

whatsapp-icon telegram-icon
whatsapp-icon Back to top