SupremeToday Landscape Ad
Back
Next
Judicial Analysis Court Copy Headnote Facts Arguments Court observation
Listen Audio Icon Pause Audio Icon
judgment-img

2015 Supreme(Kar) 802

N.KUMAR
Venkataswamy – Appellant
Versus
Annemma – Respondent


Advocates:
Advocate Appeared:
For the Appellant : S. Siddappa, Adv.
For the Respondents: V. Sudhakar, Adv.

ORDER :

N. Kumar, J.

1. The defendants have preferred these writ petitions challenging the order passed by the Trial Court regarding the admissibility of unregistered Panchayath partition deed dated 05.10.2008. It was held that the said document is inadmissible in evidence for want of stamp duty and for non-registration.

2. The plaintiff filed O.S. No. 4/2009 on the file of the Civil Judge (Sr. Dn.) at Devanahalli for a relief of partition and separate possession of her 1/4th share in all the plaint schedule properties. The plaintiff is the sister of the defendants. It is her case that they constituted an undivided Hindu Joint Family. The schedule properties are joint and ancestral properties of the plaintiff and defendants.

3. The defendants filed a written statement contesting the claim. They denied all the plaint allegations except the relationship of the parties. Their specific case is that on 05.10.2008, the defendants and plaintiff have entered into partition deed before the Panchayatdars and effected partition of the properties mutually. The plaintiff though not entitled to any share, on sympathetic grounds, she was given a portion of the land in Sy. No. 199/1 situated at Hunase





















Click Here to Read the rest of this document

1
2
3
4
5
6
7
8
9
10
11
SupremeToday Portrait Ad
supreme today icon
logo-black

An indispensable Tool for Legal Professionals, Endorsed by Various High Court and Judicial Officers

Please visit our Training & Support
Center or Contact Us for assistance

qr

Scan Me!

India’s Legal research and Law Firm App, Download now!

For Daily Legal Updates, Join us on :

whatsapp-icon telegram-icon
whatsapp-icon Back to top