SupremeToday Landscape Ad
Back
Next
Judicial Analysis Court Copy Headnote Facts Arguments Court observation
judgment-img

2015 Supreme(Kar) 1204

R.S.CHAUHAN
Malan Ganpat Gurav – Appellant
Versus
Annapurna Arun Sambrekar – Respondent


Advocates Appeared:
For the Appellant :G.B. Naik and P.G. Naik, Advocates

ORDER :

R.S. Chauhan, J.

1. Aggrieved by the order dated 09.09.2015, passed by the II Addl. District Judge, Belagavi, whereby the learned Judge has rejected the petitioner's application under Order VI Rule 17 CPC, for amending the plaint, the petitioner has approached this Court.

2. Briefly the facts of the case are that on 29.03.2004, the petitioner had instituted a civil suit for declaration and injunction against the respondent. In the civil suit, the petitioner has prayed that the sale deed dated 29.01.2002, entered between Smt. Surekha Vasant Sambrekar and defendant No. 2, should be declared as void ab initio. Consequently, the petitioner had also sought the relief of injunction.

3. The defendants had submitted their written statements; while defendant No. 1 denied the averments made in the plaint, the defendant Nos. 2 to 5 supported the case of the plaintiff. However, by the judgment and decree date 03.04.2008, the learned trial Court dismissed the civil suit.

4. Since the petitioner was aggrieved by the judgment and decree dated 03.04.2008, she filed a Regular Appeal before the II Addl. District Judge, Belagavi, in 2008. Subsequently, on 17.03.2011, the petitioner moved an appli














Click Here to Read the rest of this document

1
2
3
4
5
6
7
8
9
10
11
SupremeToday Portrait Ad
supreme today icon
logo-black

An indispensable Tool for Legal Professionals, Endorsed by Various High Court and Judicial Officers

Please visit our Training & Support
Center or Contact Us for assistance

qr

Scan Me!

India’s Legal research and Law Firm App, Download now!

For Daily Legal Updates, Join us on :

whatsapp-icon telegram-icon
whatsapp-icon Back to top