SupremeToday Landscape Ad
Back
Next
Judicial Analysis Court Copy Headnote Facts Arguments Court observation
judgment-img

2015 Supreme(Kar) 1216

A.N.VENUGOPALA GOWDA
Raghavendra – Appellant
Versus
State of Karnataka – Respondent


Advocates Appeared:
For the Appellants : B.S. Prasad
For the Respondents: Visweswaraiah, HCGP and Shailesh Kumar

ORDER :

A.N. Venugopal Gowda, J.

1. On a complaint filed by the second respondent, on 23.10.2008, the first respondent registered FIR in Crime No. 314/2008. After investigation, charge-sheet was filed. Cognizance having been taken for the offences punishable under S. 420 read with S.34 of IPC, C.C. No. 11008/2010 was registered and process was issued to Nagappa S/o. late Ramachandraiah and the petitioners herein. Seeking quashing of the said proceedings, this petition under S. 482 of Cr.P.C. was filed. The second respondent has instituted O.S. No. 26955/2010 on 18.11.2010 against all the accused, to pass a decree directing the defendants to pay jointly and severally Rs. 13,78,000/- with interest at 18% p.a. The suit is pending on the file of Addl. City Civil and Sessions Judge, Bengaluru City.

2. The cause of action for the abovesaid proceedings is an Agreement of Sale dated 19.11.2007, between the complainant and the first accused/first defendant - Nagappa S/o. Late Ramachandraiah, and the subsequent actions in relation thereto.

3. Sri. B.S. Prasad, learned advocate, contended that no case having been made out for the offence under S. 420, IPC and the essential ingrethents of cheating

















Click Here to Read the rest of this document

1
2
3
4
5
6
7
8
9
10
11
SupremeToday Portrait Ad
supreme today icon
logo-black

An indispensable Tool for Legal Professionals, Endorsed by Various High Court and Judicial Officers

Please visit our Training & Support
Center or Contact Us for assistance

qr

Scan Me!

India’s Legal research and Law Firm App, Download now!

For Daily Legal Updates, Join us on :

whatsapp-icon telegram-icon
whatsapp-icon Back to top