N.KUMAR, B.VEERAPPA
Syed Basheer Malik – Appellant
Versus
Jameela Begum – Respondent
N. Kumar, J.
1. This regular first appeal is preferred by defendant Nos. 9 and 10 in the suit O.S. No. 1419/1981 challenging the judgment and decree of the trial Court holding that the sale deeds under which they are claiming title to item No. 1 of the 'B' Schedule property is hit by Section 52 of the Transfer of Property Act and consequently null and void and that they are not entitled to the relief of equity. All other parties to the suit have compromised their claims and, therefore, none of them have preferred any appeal. Thus, the subject matter of this appeal is, all that piece and parcel of house property bearing No. 7, situated in O. Shangnessry Road, Bangalore-25, which is more particularly described as item No. 1 in Schedule 'B' to the plaint Schedule.
2. For the purpose of convenience, the parties are referred to as they are referred to in the original suit.
3. One Smt. Jameela Begum and Smt. Iqbal Begum filed suit O.S. No. 1419/1981 for partition and separate possession of their legitimate share in Schedule A, B and C properties. The first plaintiff was the only daughter of late Haji Mohammad Ghouse who died several years ago. He was a prominent business man in Ba
Pushpa Devi Bhagat v. Rajinder Singh and Others reported in (2006) 5 SCC 566
Hafeza Bibi & Ors. v. Shaikh Farid (Dead) by L.Rs & Ors. reported in AIR 2011 SC 1695
Samarendra Nath Sinha v. Krishna Kumar Nag (AIR 1967 SC 1440))
Durga Prasad v. Deep Chand (AIR 1954 SC 75)
Sanjay Verma v. Manik Roy and Others’ [AIR 2007 SC 1332]
Dhanlakshmi & Others v. P. Mohan & Others’ [AIR 2007 SC 1062]
Login now and unlock free premium legal research
Login to SupremeToday AI and access free legal analysis, AI highlights, and smart tools.
Login
now!
India’s Legal research and Law Firm App, Download now!
Copyright © 2023 Vikas Info Solution Pvt Ltd. All Rights Reserved.