ARAVIND KUMAR
Bijith International Builders – Appellant
Versus
Dias Varghese C. – Respondent
Aravind Kumar, J.
1. This writ petition is directed against the order dated 18.08.2015 passed on I.A. No. 3 in O.S. No. 3204/2013 by IX Addl. City Civil and Sessions Judge, Bangalore - Annexure-A whereunder trial Court has rejected I.A. No. 3 filed by third defendant seeking amendment of written statement.
2. Respondents-1 and 2 herein have filed suit for specific performance of agreement of sale dated 23.06.2010 against defendants-1 and 2 represented by third defendant and seeking for execution of sale deed in favour of plaintiffs-1 and 2 jointly in respect of Schedule 'B' property. Defendants-1 and 2 have filed their written statement as per Annexure-C and so also third defendant as per Annexure-C1 and all defendants have denied the averments made in the plaint. After commencement of trial, third defendant has filed an application - I.A. No. 3 under Order 6 Rule 17 CPC - Annexure-D seeking for amendment of written statement. Said application came to be opposed by plaintiffs by filing detailed statement of objections - Annexure-E and trial Court by impugned order dated 18.08.2015 - Annexure-A has dismissed the said application.
3. It is the contention of Sri Mohan Rao, learned
HEERALAL VS. KALYAN MAL AND OTHERS
REVAJEETU BUILDERS AND DEVELOPERS VS. NARAYANASWAMY AND SONS AND OTHERS
AJENDRAPRASADJI N. PANDE AND ANR. VS. SWAMI KESHAVPRAKESHDASJI N. AND ORS. AIR 2007 SC 806
VIDYABAI & ORS. VS. PADMALATHA & ANR. AIR 2009 SC 1433
ESTRALLA RUBBER VS. DASS ESTATE (P) LTD. (2001) 8 SCC 97
STATE OF MADHYA PRADESH VS. UNION OF INDIA AND ANOTHER
USHA BALASHAHEB SWAMI AND OTHERS VS. KIRAN APPASO SWAMI AND OTHERS
Login now and unlock free premium legal research
Login to SupremeToday AI and access free legal analysis, AI highlights, and smart tools.
Login
now!
India’s Legal research and Law Firm App, Download now!
Copyright © 2023 Vikas Info Solution Pvt Ltd. All Rights Reserved.