B.MANOHAR
K. S. Ponnappa – Appellant
Versus
K. S. Bheemaiah – Respondent
B. Manohar, J.
1. Petitioners are the plaintiffs in O.S. No. 10704/2006 on the file of the XVII Additional City Civil Judge at Bengalum. Being aggrieved by the order dated 7-7-2012 made on I.A. No. 8 filed under Sections 65 and 66 of the Indian Evidence Act, the petitioners have filed this writ petition.
2. The petitioners had filed a suit seeking for partition and separate possession of 1/10th share each in the suit schedule property by metes and bounds. In the plaint, it was contended that the mother of the plaintiffs got the suit schedule property as per the agreement of sale on 28-06-1984. The original copy of the agreement of sale is with the second defendant and the plaintiffs have got only Xerox copy of the said document. It is the contention of the plaintiffs that they had also contributed for purchase of the suit schedule property and hence all the children of late K.A. Somaiah are entitled to their respective share in the suit schedule property. The plaintiffs have also filed an application I.A. No. 8 seeking permission to mark the Xerox copy of the agreement of sale as secondary evidence since they do not possess the original copy. The contesting defendants filed th
Login now and unlock free premium legal research
Login to SupremeToday AI and access free legal analysis, AI highlights, and smart tools.
Login
now!
India’s Legal research and Law Firm App, Download now!
Copyright © 2023 Vikas Info Solution Pvt Ltd. All Rights Reserved.