SupremeToday Landscape Ad
Back
Next
Judicial Analysis Court Copy Headnote Facts Arguments Court observation
Listen Audio Icon Pause Audio Icon
judgment-img

2017 Supreme(Kar) 148

K.N.PHANEENDRA
Basavanthayya S/o Shadaksharayya Hiremath – Appellant
Versus
state of Karnataka by Regional Transport Office, Koppal – Respondent


Advocates Appeared:
For the Petitioners: Sri Rajashekar R. Gunjalli
For the Respondent: Sri Shivaprabhu S. Hiremath

ORDER :

All the above said criminal revision petitions raises a common question before this Court, as such, they are taken together and a common order is passed. In all these cases the case of the prosecution, i.e., the State of Karnataka through R.T.O. Koppal, is that the accused (petitioner herein in the above said cases) is the registered owner of the vehicle bearing registered No. KA37/2612. It is the allegation that the petitioner has not paid the taxes for different periods, which are specifically enumerated below.

Crl. R.P. No.

Crl. A. No.

C.C. No.

Year

2384/2010

16/2010

768/2006

01.06.2002-28.02.2003

2387/2010

19/2010

769/2006

01.03.2003-30.11.2003

2385/2010

17/2010

770/2006

01.12.2003-31.08.2004

2388/2010

20/2010

771/2006

01.09.2004-31.05.2005

2386/2010

18/2010

772/2006

01.06.2005-28.02.2006

2. It is the allegation of the respondent-State that for the above said periods the registered owner has not paid the tax amount. Therefore, the RTO has issued a demand notices to the accused as the amounts have not been paid, as such charge sh

















Click Here to Read the rest of this document

1
2
3
4
5
6
7
8
9
10
11
SupremeToday Portrait Ad
supreme today icon
logo-black

An indispensable Tool for Legal Professionals, Endorsed by Various High Court and Judicial Officers

Please visit our Training & Support
Center or Contact Us for assistance

qr

Scan Me!

India’s Legal research and Law Firm App, Download now!

For Daily Legal Updates, Join us on :

whatsapp-icon telegram-icon
whatsapp-icon Back to top