K.N.PHANEENDRA
Basavanthayya S/o Shadaksharayya Hiremath – Appellant
Versus
state of Karnataka by Regional Transport Office, Koppal – Respondent
All the above said criminal revision petitions raises a common question before this Court, as such, they are taken together and a common order is passed. In all these cases the case of the prosecution, i.e., the State of Karnataka through R.T.O. Koppal, is that the accused (petitioner herein in the above said cases) is the registered owner of the vehicle bearing registered No. KA37/2612. It is the allegation that the petitioner has not paid the taxes for different periods, which are specifically enumerated below.
Crl. R.P. No.
Crl. A. No.
C.C. No.
Year
2384/2010
16/2010
768/2006
01.06.2002-28.02.2003
2387/2010
19/2010
769/2006
01.03.2003-30.11.2003
2385/2010
17/2010
770/2006
01.12.2003-31.08.2004
2388/2010
20/2010
771/2006
01.09.2004-31.05.2005
2386/2010
18/2010
772/2006
01.06.2005-28.02.2006
2. It is the allegation of the respondent-State that for the above said periods the registered owner has not paid the tax amount. Therefore, the RTO has issued a demand notices to the accused as the amounts have not been paid, as such charge sh
Login now and unlock free premium legal research
Login to SupremeToday AI and access free legal analysis, AI highlights, and smart tools.
Login
now!
India’s Legal research and Law Firm App, Download now!
Copyright © 2023 Vikas Info Solution Pvt Ltd. All Rights Reserved.