SupremeToday Landscape Ad
Back
Next
Judicial Analysis Court Copy Headnote Facts Arguments Court observation
judgment-img

2017 Supreme(Kar) 63

R.B.BUDIHAL
H. O. Chandrashekar – Appellant
Versus
State By the Sub-Inspector of Police Thirthahalli – Respondent


Advocates Appeared:
For the Petitioner: Sri. N.K. Ramesh
For the Respondent: Sri. K. Nageshwarappa

ORDER :

This is the revision petition filed by the petitioner – accused No.1 challenging the judgment and order of conviction dated 26/27.05.2010 passed by the C.J. (Jr. Dn.) JMFC court at Tirthahalli in C.C. No. 731/2003 and also the judgment and order dated 10.12.2010 passed by the Sessions Judge, I Fast Track Court at Shivamogga, in Crl. A. No.49/2010.

2. By the judgment and order of conviction, the trial court convicting the revision petitioner accused No.1 for the offence punishable under Section 326 and 504 of the IPC and acquitted the said accused for the offence under Section 323. So also acquitted accused No.2 and 3 from all the offences charged against them. Being aggrieved by the judgment and order of conviction the revision petitioner – accused No.1 preferred the criminal appeal and the First Appellate Court also after re-appreciating the materials dismissed the appeal confirming the judgment and order of conviction passed by the trial court. Being aggrieved, the revision petitioner is before this court in this revision petition.

3. Brief facts of the prosecution case that complainant, accused No.1 and one H.O. Shreekantha are the brothers and there has been a dispute amon
















Click Here to Read the rest of this document

1
2
3
4
5
6
7
8
9
10
11
SupremeToday Portrait Ad
supreme today icon
logo-black

An indispensable Tool for Legal Professionals, Endorsed by Various High Court and Judicial Officers

Please visit our Training & Support
Center or Contact Us for assistance

qr

Scan Me!

India’s Legal research and Law Firm App, Download now!

For Daily Legal Updates, Join us on :

whatsapp-icon telegram-icon
whatsapp-icon Back to top