Aggrieved by the communication dated 7.10.2015, sent by the Supreme Court Legal Services Committee, and aggrieved by the communication dated 11.9.2015 sent by the Under Secretary, National Legal Services Authority, to the Secretary, Supreme Court Legal Services Committee, the petitioner has approached this Court.

2. Briefly the facts of the case are that the petitioner was aggrieved by the orders passed by this Court in Writ Petition No.28190/2014, and in Writ Petition No.28191/2014. Therefore, the petitioner filed two separate Special Leave Petitions before the Hon’ble Supreme Court. But, in order to contest the two Special Leave Petitions, he approached the Secretary, Supreme Court Legal Services Committee, respondent No.1, for providing him legal aid. However, by order dated 7.10.2015, the respondent No.1 sent a letter to the petitioner interalia on the ground that the petitioner is not entitled for legal aid as the matter is devoid of any merit.

3. It seems that the petitioner had written a letter dated 17.8.2015 to the National Legal Services Authority with regard to nonfunctioning of the Karnataka State Legal Services Authority units. A copy of the said letter was forwar