SupremeToday Landscape Ad
Back
Next
Judicial Analysis Court Copy Headnote Facts Arguments Court observation
judgment-img

2017 Supreme(Kar) 6

ANAND BYRAREDDY
Mehaboob Daula – Appellant
Versus
State of Karnataka – Respondent


Advocates Appeared:
For the Appellant : R.K. Mahadeva
For the Respondents: S. Vishwamurthy

ORDER :

Anand Byrareddy, J.

1. Heard the learned counsel for the petitioners.

2. The petitioners are the accused standing trial for offences punishable under Section 20(b)(i)(c) of the Narcotic Drugs and Psychotropic Substances Act, 1985 (hereinafter referred to as 'the NDPS Act', for brevity). It is seen from the facts alleged on the basis of a complaint dated 14.01.2014, whereby credible information is said to have been received at 7.00 a.m. on that day that there were some persons seen to be attempting to sell 'ganja' on MKDK Road of Mandi Mohalla, Mysore City, and the complainant on receiving such information, had proceeded to the spot along with Panchayatdars and his men. They had hid themselves on a corner of MKDK Road and did observe that there were three men and a female who were in conversation at the spot and the female was seen to be counting money. Accused No. 4 is said to have paid cash to Accused No. 3, who in turn had handed over the bags to Accused Nos. 1 and 2. It is at that point of time that the complainant and his men had intervened and had seized articles held by each of those persons and on examination, it was found that the bags which were handed over contained








Click Here to Read the rest of this document

1
2
3
4
5
6
7
8
9
10
11
SupremeToday Portrait Ad
supreme today icon
logo-black

An indispensable Tool for Legal Professionals, Endorsed by Various High Court and Judicial Officers

Please visit our Training & Support
Center or Contact Us for assistance

qr

Scan Me!

India’s Legal research and Law Firm App, Download now!

For Daily Legal Updates, Join us on :

whatsapp-icon telegram-icon
whatsapp-icon Back to top