K.N. PHANEENDRA, J.

We would like to begin this judgment with a quote that “A SANER THOUGHT WILL ALWAYS THROW LIGHT EVEN ON THE SAME SUBJECT”.

2. The important moot question that arises for our consideration apart from the merits of this case is:

‘as to how the courts have to understand and appreciate the contradictions and omissions in a criminal case’.

Though laudable decisions of the Hon'ble Apex Court facilitate us to understand the legal effect of the expressions, “contradictions and omissions”, but still the courts are unable to comprehend the said expressions in a proper perspective. Therefore, it is just and necessary for all of us to be innovative every day. It is said that yesterday is not ours, whatever happened has happened. But tomorrow is ours. Hence, we have to be very innovative in order to achieve excellence in our day to day work. Therefore, we would like to discuss the above said aspects i.e., contradictions and omissions in a detailed manner supported by earlier and latest decisions of the Hon'ble Apex Court. Though the courts cannot make a judgment of Zero Defective, in our opinion, we can march towards to make our judgments minimum defective as far as poss