SUBHRO KAMAL MUKHERJEE, BUDIHAL R.B.
Citizens Forum for Mangalore Development – Appellant
Versus
State of Karnataka – Respondent
All the above writ petitions are filed by way of public interest litigations.
2. Since common questions of law and facts are involved in all the above writ petitions, they are taken up together to dispose of them by this common order, in order to avoid repetition of facts and law.
3. The sum and substance of the prayers sought in all the above writ petitions are to declare the Karnataka Town and Country Planning and Certain Other Laws (Amendment) Act, 2013; the Karnataka Town and Country Planning and Certain Other Laws (Amendment) Act, 2009; the Karnataka Town and Country Planning Act and Certain Other Laws (Amendment) Act, 2004; the Karnataka Town and Country Planning (Regularisation of Unauthorised Development or Constructions) Rules 2014; Section 321A of the Karnataka Municipal Corporation Act, 1976 and Section 187A of the Karnataka Municipalities Act, 1964, as unconstitutional, illegal and ultravires Articles 14 and 21 of the Constitution of India; The further prayer sought in the writ petitions are to issue writ of mandamus to respondents and its officials restraini
Consumer Action Group and Another Vs. State of Tamilnadu and Others, reported in (2000) 7 SCC 425
Bhaiji Vs. sub-divisional officer, Thandla and Others
Bakhtawar Trust and Others Vs. M.D. Narayan and Others
Shri Ram Krishna Dalmia Vs. Shri Justice S R Tendolkar and Others and etc.
Login now and unlock free premium legal research
Login to SupremeToday AI and access free legal analysis, AI highlights, and smart tools.
Login
now!
India’s Legal research and Law Firm App, Download now!
Copyright © 2023 Vikas Info Solution Pvt Ltd. All Rights Reserved.