SupremeToday Landscape Ad
Back
Next
Judicial Analysis Court Copy Headnote Facts Arguments Court observation
Listen Audio Icon Pause Audio Icon
judgment-img

2017 Supreme(Kar) 404

A.N.VENUGOPALA GOWDA
G. RAJU, S/O. K. GANGAIAH – Appellant
Versus
DIRECTOR (ADMN. & HR) – Respondent


Advocates Appeared:
For the Petitioners: Sri K. Srinivasa, Adv.
For the Respondents: Sri Harikrishna S. Holla, Adv.

ORDER :

The short but interesting point which arises in these petitions is ‘whether the petitioners who retired from service on reaching the age of superannuation can claim the benefit of an annual increment, which did not accrue while they were in service?’

2. The petitioners are retired employees of Karnataka Power Transmission Corporation Limited. Detailed reference to the factual aspect of the service rendered is unnecessary. The relevant service particulars are the following:

Sl. No.

Name of the petitioner

Designation

D.O.B.

Date of entry into service

Date of retirement

Date of next increment

1.

G. Raju

Assistant

12.06.1952

01.07.1980

30.06.2012

01.07.2012

2.

Sri Sidda Shetty

Senior Assistant

05.03.1952

07.05.1973

31.03.2012

01.04.2012

3.

Sri C.P. Mundinamani

Assistant

12.03.1947

11.02.1969

31.03.2005

01.04.2005

4.

Sri C.H. Barki

Junior Engineer (Ele)

13.03.1947

21.04.1976

31.03.2005

01.04.2005

5.

Sri V.N. Malode

Junior Engineer (Ele)

15.04.1949

17.09.1971

30.04.2007

01.05.2007





















Click Here to Read the rest of this document

1
2
3
4
5
6
7
8
9
10
11
SupremeToday Portrait Ad
supreme today icon
logo-black

An indispensable Tool for Legal Professionals, Endorsed by Various High Court and Judicial Officers

Please visit our Training & Support
Center or Contact Us for assistance

qr

Scan Me!

India’s Legal research and Law Firm App, Download now!

For Daily Legal Updates, Join us on :

whatsapp-icon telegram-icon
whatsapp-icon Back to top