SupremeToday Landscape Ad
Back
Next
Judicial Analysis Court Copy Headnote Facts Arguments Court observation
Listen Audio Icon Pause Audio Icon
judgment-img

2017 Supreme(Kar) 346

H.G.RAMESH
Vinod Sequeira, S/o Late S. J. Sequeira – Appellant
Versus
Rita F. Monteiro, D/o Mr. Baptist Monteiro – Respondent


Advocates Appeared:
For the Petitioner:Sri H.N. Manjunath Prasad, Advocate.
For the Respondent:Sri Vijay Krishna Bhat M., Advocate.

ORDER :

H.G. RAMESH, J.

How to determine the correct stamp duty payable on documents? This is the short question that requires to be examined in this case.

2. This writ petition is by a plaintiff and is directed against an interlocutory order dated 29.08.2013 passed by the trial Court, whereby it has impounded an agreement of sale dated 25.11.2003 and has directed the petitioner-plaintiff to pay a deficit stamp duty of Rs.31,800/- and a penalty of Rs.3,18,000/- on the said agreement.

3. I have heard learned counsel appearing for the petitioner and respondent No.1 and perused the record.

4. The question for consideration in this petition is as to whether the aforesaid agreement of sale dated 25.11.2003 was chargeable with stamp duty as per Article 5(e)(i) of the Schedule to the Karnataka Stamp Act, 1957 (‘the Act’ for short) as it stood on the date of the agreement of sale i.e. 25.11.2003; Article 5(e) as on that date was as follows:

“5. Agreement or its records or Memorandum of an agreement,-

 

(a) …………………………………………..

………………………………………………

 

(e) If relating to sale of













Click Here to Read the rest of this document

1
2
3
4
5
6
7
8
9
10
11
SupremeToday Portrait Ad
supreme today icon
logo-black

An indispensable Tool for Legal Professionals, Endorsed by Various High Court and Judicial Officers

Please visit our Training & Support
Center or Contact Us for assistance

qr

Scan Me!

India’s Legal research and Law Firm App, Download now!

For Daily Legal Updates, Join us on :

whatsapp-icon telegram-icon
whatsapp-icon Back to top