SupremeToday Landscape Ad
Back
Next
Judicial Analysis Court Copy Headnote Facts Arguments Court observation
Listen Audio Icon Pause Audio Icon
judgment-img

2017 Supreme(Kar) 514

K.SOMASHEKAR
SHIVAPPA S/O SIDDAPPA MALI – Appellant
Versus
STATE OF KARNATAKA – Respondent


Advocates Appeared:
FOR THE PETITIONER: SHIVARAJ P. MUDHOL
FOR THE RESPONDENTS: K. VIDYAVATI

ORDER :

Heard the learned counsel for the petitioner and as well as the learned AGA for respondent Nos.1 to 3.

2. This writ petition is filed by the petitioner seeking to issue writ in the nature of mandamus, directing the respondent Nos.2 and 3 to provide police protection to the petitioner and his property bearing new Sy. No.65/2/2 (old Sy. No.65/5) measuring 8 acres 7 guntas situated at Gadyal Village, Jamkhandi Taluk, Bagalkot District, as per Annexures – E, F, F1 & G.

3. Learned counsel for the petitioner in support of his case has placed reliance of the judgments of the Hon’ble Supreme Court in the case of P.R. Murlidharan & others vs. Swami Dharmanand Theertha Padar & others and also in the case of Moran M. Baselios Marthoma Mathews vs. State of Kerala, wherein it is held that a writ petition for providing police protection is maintainable.

4. Learned AGA for respondent Nos.1 to 3 submitted that based upon the complaint filed by the petitioner vide Annexure – J, FIR dated 17.05.2016 vide Annexure – J1, came to be registered by the Sub Inspector of Police, Savalgi Police Station.

5. The petitioner has contended that there is a civil decree in favour of the petitioner herein and it





Click Here to Read the rest of this document

1
2
3
4
5
6
7
8
9
10
11
SupremeToday Portrait Ad
supreme today icon
logo-black

An indispensable Tool for Legal Professionals, Endorsed by Various High Court and Judicial Officers

Please visit our Training & Support
Center or Contact Us for assistance

qr

Scan Me!

India’s Legal research and Law Firm App, Download now!

For Daily Legal Updates, Join us on :

whatsapp-icon telegram-icon
whatsapp-icon Back to top