2017 Supreme(Kar) 463
IN THE HIGH COURT OF KARNATAKA AT DHARWAD BENCH
VINEET KOTHARI, H.B. PRABHAKARA SASTRY, JJ.
The Pr. Commissioner of Income Tax & Anr. - Appellants
Vs.
The Totagars Co-Operative Sale Society - Respondent
Income Tax Appeal Nos. 100066, 100064, 100065, 100067, 100068 & 100051-100054 of 2016
Decided On : 16-06-2017
Advocate Appeared:
For the Appellants : Sri. Y.V. Raviraj
Fro the Respondent: Sri. A. Shankar, M. Lava & S.S. Hegde
Headnote:INCOME TAX ACT, 1961 [C.A. NO. 43/1961] - Sections 56, 80-P & 260-A - Deduction under Section 80-P(2)(d) -Whether the assessee, a Co-operative Society is entitled to 100% deduction under Section 80-P(2)(d) in respect of whole of its income by way of interest earned by it during Assessment years 2007-2008 to 2011-2012 on deposits or investments made by it during these years with a co-operative Bank? And Whether decision of Supreme Court in case of assessee [(2010) 322 ITR 283 SC; (2010) 3 SCC 323 for Assessment years 1991-1992to 1999-2000 (except Assessment year 1995-1996) holding that interest income earned by assessee was taxable under head "Income from other sources" under Section 56 of the Act and was not 100% deductible from the gross total income under Section 80P(2)(a)(i) f the Act is not applicable to Assessment years 2007-2008 to 2011-2012? Held, Character of income depends upon the nature of activity for earning that income and though on the face of it, the same may appear to be falling in any of the specified Clauses of Section 80-P(2) of the Act, but on a deeper analysis of the facts, it may become ineligible for deduction under Section 80-P(2) of the Act. Hence, the income by way of interest earned by deposit or investment of idle or surplus funds does not change its character irrespective of the fact whether such income of interest is earned from a schedule bank or a co-operative bank and thus, clause (d) of Section 80-P(2) of the Act would not apply in the facts and circumstances of he present case. The person or body corporate from which such interest income is received will not change its character, viz., interest income not arising from its business operations, which made it ineligible for deduction under Section 80-P of the Act, as held by the Hon'ble Supreme Court. In view of the aforesaid, we are of the opinion that the appeals filed by the Revenue Deserve to be allowed and the appeals filed by the assessee deserve to be dismissed. The issue relating to the justifiability of the reassessment under Section 147/148 of the Act also becomes academic once the conclusion is arrived at that the deduction under Section 80-P(2) of the Act was not available to the assessee for these Assessment Years. The substantial questions of law framed above are thus answered in favour of the Revenue and against the assessee and it is held that the income by way of interest earned by the assessee co-operative society during the Assessment Years 2007-2008 to 2011-12 on the investments made in the co-operative bank are not eligible for deductions under Section 80-P(2)(d) of the Act. The appeals of the Revenue are accordingly allowed and those of the assessee are dismissed.
1. The aforesaid five Income Tax Appeals are filed by the Revenue while another set of five appeals have been filed by the assessee and all the ten appeals are being disposed of by this common judgment.
2. The substantial questions of law involved in the present appeals filed by the Revenue are as follows:
“(I) Whether the assessee, Totagar Cooperative Sale Society, Sirsi, is entitled to 100% deduction under Section 80P(2)(d) of the Income Tax Act, 1961 (for short ‘the Act’) in respect of whole of its income by way of interest earned by it during the relevant Assessment Years from 2007-2008 to 2011-2012 on the deposits or investments made by it during these years with a Co-operative Bank, M/s.Kanara District Central Co-operative Bank Limited?
(II) Whether the Supreme Court decision in the case of the present respondent assessee, Totgar Co-operative Sale Society Limited itself rendered on 08th February 2010, in Totgar’s Co-operative Sale Society Limited vs. Income Tax Officer, reported in (2010) 322 ITR 283 SC : (2010) 3 SCC 223 for the preceding years, namely Assessment Years 1991-1992 to 1999-2000 (except Assessment Year 1995-1996) holding that such interest income earned by the assessee was taxable under the head ‘Income from Other Sources’ under Section 56 of the Act and was not 100% deductible from the Gross Total Income under Section 80P(2)(a)(i) of the Act, is not applicable to the present Assessment Years 2007-2008 to 2011-2012 involved in the present appeals and therefore, whether the Income Tax Appellate Tribunal as well as CIT (Appeals) were justified in holding that such interest income was 100% deductible under Section 80P(2)(d) of the Act?”
3. The ratio decidendi of the Supreme Court decision in the case of assessee, Totagar’s Co-operative Sale Society Limited itself, was that such interest income earned by the assessee was not the income from the business as a Cooperative Society, but was income from other sources taxable under Section 56 of the Act, whereas Section 80P(2)(a) of the Act included and permitted such 100% deduction if such income is earned by the co-operative society by carrying on the business of banking or providing credit facilities to its members or a cottage industry or the marketing of the agricultural produces grown by its members, etc.
4. The relevant portion of the judgment of the Hon’ble Supreme Court is quoted below for ready reference:
“At the outset, an important circumstance needs to be highlighted. In the present case, the interest held not eligible for deduction under Section 80P(2)(a)(i) of the Act is not the interest received from the members for providing credit facilities to them. What is sought to be taxed under Section 56 of the Act is the interest income arising on the surplus invested in short-term deposits and securities which surplus was not required for business purposes. Assessee(s) markets the produce of its members whose sale proceeds at times were retained by it. In this case, we are concerned with the tax treatment of such amount. Since the fund created by such retention was not required immediately for business purposes, it was invested in specified securities. The question, before us, is - whether interest on such deposits/securities, which strictly speaking accrues to the members' account, could be taxed as business income under Section 28 of the Act? In our view, such interest income would come in the category of "Income from other sources", hence, such interest income would be taxable under Section 56 of the Act, as rightly held by the Assessing Officer.
In this connection, we may analyze Section 80P of the Act. This section comes in Chapter VIA, which, in turn, deals with "Deductions in respect of certain Incomes". The Heading of Section 80P indicates that the said section deals with deductions in respect of income of cooperative Societies. Section 80P(1), inter alia, states that where the gross total income of a Cooperative Society includes any income from o