SupremeToday Landscape Ad
Back
Next
Judicial Analysis Court Copy Headnote Facts Arguments Court observation
judgment-img

2017 Supreme(Kar) 484

JAYANT PATEL, S.SUJATHA
DANIEL ANAND S/O JAYAKUMAR – Appellant
Versus
G. N. SUJATHA W/O DANIEL ANAND – Respondent


Advocates Appeared:
For the Appellant : SMT. S. SUSHEELA.

ORDER :

1. This appeal is directed against the Judgment and order passed by the I-Additional Prl. Family Court, Mysuru (‘Family Court’ for short) in M.C. No. 75/2014 directing the appellant herein to pay permanent alimony of Rs. 5 lakhs to the respondent.

2. Facts in brief are:

The appellant and the respondent got married to each other as per Christian Customary Rights on 28.12.2016 at Bethel Brothern Church, Krishnamurthypuram, Mysuru. The couple had a female child by name Grace Jacintha in the wedlock, who is now aged about 8 years. Due to the matrimonial disharmony between the couple, the appellant herein filed petition under Section 10 (1) (x) of the Divorce Act, 1869 (the ‘Act’ for short) before the Family Court. So also, the respondent filed C. Misc. No. 437/2014 against the appellant claiming maintenance. The Court below clubbed both the petitions and passed common judgment and order on 01.02.2017. The petition filed by the appellant for divorce was allowed and the C. Misc. No. 437/2014 filed by the respondent for maintenance was dismissed. However, while granting the decree of divorce, the Court below directed the appellant herein to pay permanent alimony of Rs. 5 lakhs. The s














Click Here to Read the rest of this document

1
2
3
4
5
6
7
8
9
10
11
SupremeToday Portrait Ad
supreme today icon
logo-black

An indispensable Tool for Legal Professionals, Endorsed by Various High Court and Judicial Officers

Please visit our Training & Support
Center or Contact Us for assistance

qr

Scan Me!

India’s Legal research and Law Firm App, Download now!

For Daily Legal Updates, Join us on :

whatsapp-icon telegram-icon
whatsapp-icon Back to top