K.N.PHANEENDRA
Sachin Naik Alias Sumant Kumar Das – Appellant
Versus
State of Karnataka – Respondent
K.N. Phaneendra, J.
1. Heard learned Counsel for petitioner. Learned High Court Government Pleader takes notice for respondent 1.
2. Learned Counsel for the petitioner files a memo for deletion of respondent No. 2 from the array of parties, as he is not a necessary party before this Court, as the order passed by the learned Trial Judge is not affecting the right of respondent No. 2 in any manner, memo is recorded and petitioner is permitted to delete respondent No. 2 from the array of parties.
3. It is seen from the records that this petitioner is an accused in Crime No. 363/2016 for the offence punishable under Sections 417, 420 read with Section 34 of Indian Penal Code, Vide order dated 16.12.2016 the respondent-police have made a requisition to the Trial Judge on 16-12-2016 seeking for a body warrant (PT) against the accused-petitioner herein as the petitioner was in custody in connection with Crime No. 910/2016 of Madivala Police. Accordingly said order was issued by the Magistrate on 16.12.2016. On 17.12.2016 the Police Inspector of Hennur Police submitted the requisition seeking permission to produce the accused from judicial custody before the open Court to obtain the ac
Login now and unlock free premium legal research
Login to SupremeToday AI and access free legal analysis, AI highlights, and smart tools.
Login
now!
India’s Legal research and Law Firm App, Download now!
Copyright © 2023 Vikas Info Solution Pvt Ltd. All Rights Reserved.