SupremeToday Landscape Ad
Back
Next
Judicial Analysis Court Copy Headnote Facts Arguments Court observation
Listen Audio Icon Pause Audio Icon
judgment-img

2017 Supreme(Kar) 579

ASHOK B.HINCHIGERI
Sannaswamy – Appellant
Versus
Shivamma – Respondent


Advocates:
Advocate Appeared:
For the Appellants : M.K. Sripathi
For the Respondents: N. Vageesh

JUDGMENT :

1. This appeal is preferred by the defendant Nos.1 to 4 against the judgment passed by the Court of the V Additional Sessions Judge, Mysore in R.A.No.434/2012. During the pendency of the appeal, defendant No.2 died.

2. The facts of the case in brief are that the respondent Nos.1 and 2 filed O.S. No. 494/2004 against the appellants and five others seeking the relief of partition and separate possession of half share of the second plaintiff in and upon the plaint schedule property. They have also sought the monthly maintenance of Rs.4,000/- for the first plaintiff. Further, they sought perpetual injunction for restraining the defendant Nos.1 to 4 from alienating the plaint schedule properties to defraud the rights of the plaintiffs. The plaintiff No.1 claims to be the second wife of the defendant No.1 and that the plaintiff No.2 is born in the relationship between the plaintiff No.1 and the defendant No.1. The defendant No.2 is the first wife of the defendant No.1 and the defendant Nos.3 and 4 are the daughters born in the wedlock between the defendant Nos.1 and 2. The defendant Nos.1 to 4 have filed the written statement denying the plaint averments, particularly the claim






















Click Here to Read the rest of this document

1
2
3
4
5
6
7
8
9
10
11
SupremeToday Portrait Ad
supreme today icon
logo-black

An indispensable Tool for Legal Professionals, Endorsed by Various High Court and Judicial Officers

Please visit our Training & Support
Center or Contact Us for assistance

qr

Scan Me!

India’s Legal research and Law Firm App, Download now!

For Daily Legal Updates, Join us on :

whatsapp-icon telegram-icon
whatsapp-icon Back to top