SupremeToday Landscape Ad
Back
Next
Judicial Analysis Court Copy Headnote Facts Arguments Court observation
Listen Audio Icon Pause Audio Icon
judgment-img

2017 Supreme(Kar) 776

R.S.CHAUHAN
G. B. Uday – Appellant
Versus
K. Mohan Kumar – Respondent


Advocates Appeared:
For the Petitioner: K.P. Asokumar.
For the Respondents: J. Nataraj, Dr. R. Ramachandran.

JUDGMENT :

1. The petitioners have challenged the legality of the order, dated 07.11.2016, passed by the Joint Commissioner (South), Bruhat Bengaluru Mahanagara Palike (BBMP, for short), whereby the learned Joint Commissioner has allowed the review petition filed by the respondent No. 1, Mr. K. Mohan Kumar, against the amalgamation of the Katha, which allegedly belonged to the petitioners, and has directed that fresh enquiries should be held, and the parties should be heard, and a fresh order with regard to amalgamation of Katha should be passed.

2. Briefly the facts of the case are that according to the petitioners, their father, Mr. G. Basavaraj, was the owner of an agricultural land bearing Sy. No. 33/2A, 33/3, 34/6, 34/8 in Doddabylakhana, Doddamavalli village, Bangalore. Presently the property bears No. 24/2, Dispensary Cross, J.C. Road, Ward No. 118, Bangalore. Further, according to the petitioners, the said property fell in their father's share after the family property was partitioned by a Partition Deed dated 30.12.1954. The said partition deed was registered with the Sub-Registrar, Bangalore City. The fact of the partition and the transfer of the properties in the name of p



















Click Here to Read the rest of this document

1
2
3
4
5
6
7
8
9
10
11
SupremeToday Portrait Ad
supreme today icon
logo-black

An indispensable Tool for Legal Professionals, Endorsed by Various High Court and Judicial Officers

Please visit our Training & Support
Center or Contact Us for assistance

qr

Scan Me!

India’s Legal research and Law Firm App, Download now!

For Daily Legal Updates, Join us on :

whatsapp-icon telegram-icon
whatsapp-icon Back to top