ARAVIND KUMAR
Bharat Bhushan Narang – Appellant
Versus
Ashok Kumar Manchanda – Respondent
Aravind Kumar, J.
1. Defendants 5 to 9 in O.S. No. 5053 of 1990 being aggrieved by order dated 1-2-2017 allowing the application filed by the plaintiff under Order 6, Rule 17 of Civil Procedure Code, 1908 to amend the plaint are before this Court.
2. Parties are referred to as per their rank in the Trial Court.
3. Plaintiff has instituted the suit in question i.e., O.S. No. 5053 of 1990 for the relief of partition and separate possession of suit properties as described in Schedule A and Schedule B of the plaint and claiming share of ¼th and 5/12th respectively. Prayer for declaring the Will dated 22-1-1988 said to have been executed by the father of plaintiff and defendants 1 and 3 is also sought on the ground that it is a forged document. When the matter was at the stage of final arguments, an application under Order 6, Rule 17 of CPC came to be filed by the plaintiff seeking amendment of plaint and Trial Court by order dated 1-2-2017-Annexure-A has allowed the application. Being aggrieved by the same, defendants 5 to 9 are before this Court.
4. I have heard the arguments of Sri Dhyan Chinnappa and Sri S.S. Naganand, learned Senior Advocates appearing for the parties.
5. Noti
K.V. Sathyamurthy and Others v. K.G. Srinivasa and Others
L.C. Hanumanthappa (since dead) represented by his L.Rs v. H.B. Shivakumar
Revajeetu Builders and Developers v. Narayanaswamy and Sons and Others
Radhika Devi v. Bajrangi Singh and Others
Surender Kumar Sharma v. Makhan Singh
Vasudev Ramchandra Shelat v. Pranlal Jayanand Thaker and Others
Login now and unlock free premium legal research
Login to SupremeToday AI and access free legal analysis, AI highlights, and smart tools.
Login
now!
India’s Legal research and Law Firm App, Download now!
Copyright © 2023 Vikas Info Solution Pvt Ltd. All Rights Reserved.