SupremeToday Landscape Ad
Back
Next
Judicial Analysis Court Copy Headnote Facts Arguments Court observation
Listen Audio Icon Pause Audio Icon
judgment-img

2017 Supreme(Kar) 994

L.NARAYANA SWAMY
S. Velu – Appellant
Versus
Mahesh S – Respondent


Advocates Appeared:
For the Petitioner:Ravishankar S. Advocate
For the Respondent:H.P. Leeladhar, Advocate

ORDER :

L. Narayana Swamy, J.

This Civil Revision Petition is filed by the petitioner, who was the obstructer in Ex. P No.1076/2016, being aggrieved of the order dated 26.9.2016 in the said execution petition, directing the petitioner to pay a sum of Rs.1,62,800/- towards deficit duty and penalty in respect of the lease agreement dated 5.3.2012, on which basis, the petitioner claims to be in possession of the petition property.

2. The brief facts of the case are that the respondent and another filed suit for ejectment against one Sri. Shabarish and the suit came to be decreed by the judgment and decree dated 10.3.2016. The said judgment and decree was put in execution, in which the petitioner filed obstruction application. The said obstruction application was put into enquiry. The petitioner was examined as PW-1 and he wanted to rely upon a lease agreement. The respondent raised an objection for marking the said document on the ground of insufficiency of stamp duty and its non registration. Under the said lease agreement, a sum of Rs.15,00,000/- was stated to have been paid as a
















Click Here to Read the rest of this document

1
2
3
4
5
6
7
8
9
10
11
SupremeToday Portrait Ad
supreme today icon
logo-black

An indispensable Tool for Legal Professionals, Endorsed by Various High Court and Judicial Officers

Please visit our Training & Support
Center or Contact Us for assistance

qr

Scan Me!

India’s Legal research and Law Firm App, Download now!

For Daily Legal Updates, Join us on :

whatsapp-icon telegram-icon
whatsapp-icon Back to top