BUDIHAL R.B.
Deeparani – Appellant
Versus
A. Rupesh Kumar – Respondent
Budihal R.B., J.
This revision petition is filed by the petitioner-accused being aggrieved by the judgment and order of conviction dated 26.6.2014 passed by the XVIII ACMM Court at Bengaluru in C.C. No.22896/2011 so also the judgment and order of confirmation dated 22.1.2015 passed by the Fast Track Sessions Judge, FTC-05, Bengaluru City in Cri.A. No.748/2014.
2. By the judgment and order of conviction, the trial Court convicted the revision-petitioner for the offence punishable under Section 138 of the Negotiable Instruments Act and sentenced her to pay fine of Rs. 5,30,000/-. Being aggrieved by the judgment and order of conviction and sentence imposed, when the accused preferred an appeal, the first appellate Court also, after considering the materials placed on record, dismissed the appeal confirming the judgment and order of conviction passed by the trial Court. Hence, this revision petition by the accused.
3. Brief facts of the case of the complainant in brief are that, the complainant had agreed to take the house of husband of petitioner-accused on lease basis for Rs. 5,50,000/-. The respondent-complainant has paid Rs. 4,60,000/- to the husband of the accused-petitioner.
Login now and unlock free premium legal research
Login to SupremeToday AI and access free legal analysis, AI highlights, and smart tools.
Login
now!
India’s Legal research and Law Firm App, Download now!
Copyright © 2023 Vikas Info Solution Pvt Ltd. All Rights Reserved.