SupremeToday Landscape Ad
Back
Next
Judicial Analysis Court Copy Headnote Facts Arguments Court observation
Listen Audio Icon Pause Audio Icon
judgment-img

2017 Supreme(Kar) 998

BUDIHAL R.B.
Deeparani – Appellant
Versus
A. Rupesh Kumar – Respondent


Advocates Appeared:
For the Petitioner:Sri. N. Suresha, Advocate
For the Respondent:Sri. P. Raju, Advocate

ORDER :

Budihal R.B., J.

This revision petition is filed by the petitioner-accused being aggrieved by the judgment and order of conviction dated 26.6.2014 passed by the XVIII ACMM Court at Bengaluru in C.C. No.22896/2011 so also the judgment and order of confirmation dated 22.1.2015 passed by the Fast Track Sessions Judge, FTC-05, Bengaluru City in Cri.A. No.748/2014.

2. By the judgment and order of conviction, the trial Court convicted the revision-petitioner for the offence punishable under Section 138 of the Negotiable Instruments Act and sentenced her to pay fine of Rs. 5,30,000/-. Being aggrieved by the judgment and order of conviction and sentence imposed, when the accused preferred an appeal, the first appellate Court also, after considering the materials placed on record, dismissed the appeal confirming the judgment and order of conviction passed by the trial Court. Hence, this revision petition by the accused.

3. Brief facts of the case of the complainant in brief are that, the complainant had agreed to take the house of husband of petitioner-accused on lease basis for Rs. 5,50,000/-. The respondent-complainant has paid Rs. 4,60,000/- to the husband of the accused-petitioner.










Click Here to Read the rest of this document

1
2
3
4
5
6
7
8
9
10
11
SupremeToday Portrait Ad
supreme today icon
logo-black

An indispensable Tool for Legal Professionals, Endorsed by Various High Court and Judicial Officers

Please visit our Training & Support
Center or Contact Us for assistance

qr

Scan Me!

India’s Legal research and Law Firm App, Download now!

For Daily Legal Updates, Join us on :

whatsapp-icon telegram-icon
whatsapp-icon Back to top