SupremeToday Landscape Ad
Back
Next
Judicial Analysis Court Copy Headnote Facts Arguments Court observation
judgment-img

2016 Supreme(Kar) 764

B.VEERAPPA
Subbamma – Appellant
Versus
Kariyappa – Respondent


Advocates Appeared:
For the Appellant :Sri. Mahendra S.S., Advocate
For the Respondent:Sri. T. Sheshagiri Rao, Advocate

ORDER :

B. Veerappa, J.

1. This is defendants' writ petition against the order on I.A. No.8 dated 08.07.2016 filed under Order 14, Rule 5 (1) & (2) of Code of Civil Procedure by the legal representatives of the 1st defendant in O.S. No.595/2009 on the file of the II Addl. Senior Civil Judge, Bengaluru Rural District, Bengaluru, dismissing the application with cost of Rs. 200/-.

2. The 1st respondent/plaintiff filed suit in O.S. No.595/2009 for declaration to declare that the plaintiff is the absolute owner of the plaint 'A' schedule property having acquired title over the same under the registered sale deed dated 29.01.1964 and for a judgment and decree directing the defendants to vacate and hand over vacant possession of the plaint 'C' and 'D' schedule properties to the plaintiff and also to direct each of the defendants to pay a sum of Rs. 3,000/- per month, as damages for their unauthorized use and occupation of the plaint 'C' and 'D' schedule properties from 21.08.2007 till they vacate and hand over vacant possession of the same to the plaintiff, contending that he acquired title to the A schedule property under a registered sale deed dated 29.01.1964 and he has been in possession


































Click Here to Read the rest of this document

1
2
3
4
5
6
7
8
9
10
11
SupremeToday Portrait Ad
supreme today icon
logo-black

An indispensable Tool for Legal Professionals, Endorsed by Various High Court and Judicial Officers

Please visit our Training & Support
Center or Contact Us for assistance

qr

Scan Me!

India’s Legal research and Law Firm App, Download now!

For Daily Legal Updates, Join us on :

whatsapp-icon telegram-icon
whatsapp-icon Back to top