N.K. SUDHINDRARAO, J.

1. Learned counsel for the petitioner present would submit that the matters which are interconnected apart from Crl. P. No. 8412/2017 and Crl. P. No. 7894/2017, is Crl. P. No. 7938/2017 and may be due to error, it is taken as Crl. P. No. 7398/2017.

2. Learned counsel for the petitioner in Crl. P. No. 8412/2017 is absent.

3. Learned counsel for the petitioner in Crl. P. No. 7894/2017 is present.

4. The learned counsel for the petitioner in Crl. P. No. 7894/2017 would submit that there are other two matters in Crl. P. No. 7938/2017 and Crl. P. No. 8412/2017, but may be due to an error, the matter is listed as Crl. P. No. 7398/2017 instead of 7938/2017. In this connection, it is necessary to mention that all the three petitions including Crl. P. No. 7938/2017 are connected, insofar as Crl. P. No.7398/2017 is to be deleted and accordingly, it is delinked.

5. In all the three matters it was submitted that application for grant of interim bail also filed. However, in Crl. P. No.7894/2017 and Crl. P. No.7938/2017, the relief is granted and in Crl. P. No. 8