SupremeToday Landscape Ad
Back
Next
Judicial Analysis Court Copy Headnote Facts Arguments Court observation
Listen Article Pause Article
judgment-img

2018 Supreme(Kar) 60

IN THE HIGH COURT OF KARNATAKA
RAGHVENDRA S. CHAUHAN, K.S. MUDAGAL, JJ.
Narotham Sharma - Petitioner
Versus
Station House Officer, Amruthahalli Police Station, Bangalore & Others - Respondents
Writ Petition (HC) No. 14 of 2018
Decided On : 02-03-2018

Advocates Appeared:
For the Petitioner: C.N. Raju
For the Respondents: A.M. Suresh Reddy

The duty of the police to protect the life of individuals and carry out impartial and thorough investigations in cases of alleged danger to life.

Headnote:

Habeas Corpus - Missing Person - Mental and Emotional Condition - Threat to Life - Crime No. 26/2018 - Section 161 of Cr.P.C. - Section 164 of Cr.P.C.

Fact of the Case:

Mrs. Susheela Sharma, the missing person, was found and produced before the court. She alleged that her daughter and others were trying to grab her properties and money through illegal means, and her life was in danger. The police had registered a case but made no progress in the investigation.

Finding of the Court:

The court found that Mrs. Susheela Sharma's life was in danger and directed the police to ensure her protection, investigate the case, and take necessary legal action against the offenders.

Issues: Threat to life, illegal property grabbing, police inaction in investigating the case.

Ratio Decidendi: The court's decision was based on the threat to Mrs. Susheela Sharma's life and the lack of progress in the police investigation.

Final Decision: The Habeas Corpus petition was disposed of with directions to provide protection to Mrs. Susheela Sharma, investigate the case, and take legal action against the offenders.

JUDGMENT :

Raghvendra S. Chauhan, J.

1. Mr. Narotham Sharma, the petitioner, has filed this Habeas Corpus petition interalia on the ground that his aunt, Mrs. Susheela Sharma, is missing from her house from 05.02.2018. When he went to her house, he was told by her neighbour that Mrs. Susheela Sharma's daughter, Mrs. Sunitha Sharma, had taken her mother, against the wishes of the mother, to a hospital. Subsequently, her whereabouts are unknown.

2. By order dated 14.02.2018, this Court had issued notice to respondent Nos.1 to 4. On 16.02.2018, the police personnel from the Amruthahalli Police Station had produced Mrs. Susheela Sharma before this Court.

3. Mrs. Susheela Sharma informed this Court that she was forcibly taken by her daughter to a hospital under the plea that she is suffering from mental illness. It appeared to this Court that Mrs. Susheela Sharma is emotionally disturbed and facing a psychological crisis because of the harassment given to her by her own daughter. Therefore, this Court felt it proper to secure a report from the experts in NIMHANS, regarding her physical, mental and emotional condition. Thus, this Court directed the Inspector of Police, Amruthahalli Police Station to contact the Director of NIMHANS, and further directed the concerned specialist to submit his/her report with regard to Mrs. Susheela Sharma's mental and emotional condition. Since Mrs. Susheela Sharma expressed her fear and anxiety that her personal safety may be at risk, this Court further directed the police to ensure that she is under proper care and security till the next date of hearing.

4. This case was listed on 28.02.2018. Initially this Court heard the plight of Mrs. Susheela Sharma in the Court Hall. But, eventually, this court felt that it would be in the interest of justice to speak to her, and to the petitioner, in the privacy of the Chamber. Therefore, this Court directed the parties and the learned counsel for the parties to appear in the Chamber.

5. This Court has extensively spoken to Mrs. Sharma in the Chamber. She informed this Court that originally she is from Jaipur where she was married of by her parents. However, after giving birth to two children, a son and a daughter, the husband left her. In order to bring up the two children, she has to fend for herself. She shifted to Bengaluru about three decades ago. During this period, she has not only earned a huge amount of money from her business in real estate, but has also bought properties, both in and around Bengaluru, in her own name. Unfortunately, during this period, she lost her son. Thus, she has only her own daughter to depend upon. Despite the bonding that should be prevalent between a mother and a daughter, according to Mrs. Susheela Sharma, it is her own daughter who is trying to grab her properties, and her monies, through illegal means. Her daughter is assisted by one Mr. Karim who has been threatening Mrs. Susheela Sharma. According to her, it is her daughter and Mr. Karim who had kidnapped her from her house, taken her to a hospital, and had even bribed the hospital doctors to declare her as insane. She further stated that already two of her properties have been transferred in the name of her daughter and Mr. Karim, without her consent. Therefore, she is of the view that her life is in danger.

6. On the said date, Mr. Narotham Sharma could not appear in the Chamber hearing as he had suddenly felt uneasy and ill. Therefore, the case was directed to be listed on the next date, namely 01.03.2018.

7. On 01.03.2018, this Court spoke to Mr. Narotham Sharma, the petitioner, in the Chamber. He has corroborated the statement made by Mrs. Susheela Sharma on 28.02.2018. According to him, Mrs. Susheela Sharma's daughter has plotted with Mr. Karim, and his associates, in order to deprive Mrs. Susheela Sharma of her properties and her monies. According to him, it is they who had kidnapped Mrs. Susheela Sharma. Furthermore, according to him, when he went to the Police Station,











Click Here to Read the rest of this document

1
2
3
4
5
6
7
8
9
10
11
SupremeToday Portrait Ad
supreme today icon
whatsapp-icon Back to top