SupremeToday Landscape Ad
Back
Next
Judicial Analysis Court Copy Headnote Facts Arguments Court observation
judgment-img

2018 Supreme(Kar) 166

B.VEERAPPA
K. Thimmaraju – Appellant
Versus
Nagaraja – Respondent


Advocates:
Advocate Appeared:
For the Appellant :Vinay G., Advocate for Nagaiah, Advocate.

ORDER :

B. Veerappa, J.

1. These writ petitions are filed by plaintiff against the order dated 12.07.2017 made in O.S. No. 18/2012 dismissing I.A. No. 9 filed by the plaintiff under Section 151 of Code of Civil Procedure and the order dated 09.09.2016 rejecting I.A. No. 5 filed by the plaintiff under Section 151 of Code of Civil Procedure.

2. The present petitioner who is the plaintiff before the Trial Court filed suit for specific performance to enforce the agreement of sale dated 23.01.2012 executed by defendant Nos. 1 to 4 in favour of the plaintiff, to declare the agreement of sale dated 18.02.2012 entered into between defendant Nos. 1 and 5 as null and void and for grant of permanent injunction against the defendants No. 1 to 4, contending that defendants Nos. 1 to 4 are the owners of land bearing Sy. No. 36/3 measuring 13 guntas including 1 gunta kharab situated at Mudugiripalya village, Gottigere Dhakle, Huttaridurga Hobli, Kunigal Taluk, Tumakuru District, morefully described in the schedule to the plaint. Defendants 1 to 4 entered into an agreement of sale with the plaintiff on 23.01.2012 in respect of the suit schedule property, for a total sale consideration of Rs. 15,60,00










































Click Here to Read the rest of this document

1
2
3
4
5
6
7
8
9
10
11
SupremeToday Portrait Ad
supreme today icon
logo-black

An indispensable Tool for Legal Professionals, Endorsed by Various High Court and Judicial Officers

Please visit our Training & Support
Center or Contact Us for assistance

qr

Scan Me!

India’s Legal research and Law Firm App, Download now!

For Daily Legal Updates, Join us on :

whatsapp-icon telegram-icon
whatsapp-icon Back to top