KRISHNA S.DIXIT
H. R. Krishnamurthy s/o Ramulu – Appellant
Versus
State of Karnataka Represented by its secretary, Department of Finance (excise) Bengaluru – Respondent
1. The Petitioner a grantee of CL2/7 license has been carrying on the liquor business at Anantpur village in Athani Taluk of Belagavi District.
2. The State Government with intent to increase its revenue promulgated a policy decision vide Notification dated 07.11.2016 at Annexure-B to the Writ Petition to carry on the liquor business through its agency namely the 3rd Respondent M.S.I.L in various places in the State by establishing liquor outlets with CL11C licenses.
3. In furtherance of the said policy decision, the Petitioner contends, the jurisdictional authorities have after survey and study identified various places proposing to establish the liquor shops therein. A list of feasible places is at Annexure-C to the Writ Petition.
4. The learned counsel for the Petitioner submits that, in the said Feasible List, the village of Shiraguppi does not figure apparently because the place is not feasible for establishment of LiquorShop.
5. The Petitioner contends that, now the several villagers have opposed the proposed establishment of M.S.I.L outlet in Shiraguppi village having a population of 8,000 or so for selling the liquor. Despite that the Respondent-Authorities are making al
Login now and unlock free premium legal research
Login to SupremeToday AI and access free legal analysis, AI highlights, and smart tools.
Login
now!
India’s Legal research and Law Firm App, Download now!
Copyright © 2023 Vikas Info Solution Pvt Ltd. All Rights Reserved.