SupremeToday Landscape Ad
Back
Next
Judicial Analysis Court Copy Headnote Facts Arguments Court observation
Listen Audio Icon Pause Audio Icon
judgment-img

2017 Supreme(Kar) 1356

K.N.PHANEENDRA
Manuja D/o Karibasappa – Appellant
Versus
State of Karnataka – Respondent


Advocates Appeared:
For the Petitioner: Sri. Maruthi G.B.
For the Respondent: Sri. S. Rachaiah.

ORDER :

1. A Suo-moto complaint has been registered by one Ravi Prasad, ASI, Yeshwanthpura Police Station. The FIR was filed and a case has been registered against the petitioner and others in Crime No. 440/2016 for the offences punishable under Sections 3, 4, 5 & 7 of Immoral Traffic Prevention Act, 1956 (for short ‘ITP Act’) and Section 370 of IPC.

2. The records disclose that the Sub-Inspector of Police has investigated the matter and submitted charge sheet for the above said offences on the allegations that the accused persons have colluded with each other and taken a house bearing No. 8/4 of Platinum City, ‘G’ Block, at Tumkuru Road and are running a brothel house therein for the purpose of wrongful gain.

3. The learned counsel strenuously attack the said charge sheet on the basis of want of power and jurisdiction of the Sub-Inspector of Police in registering the case and investigating the same, and submitting a charge-sheet before the Court and the Court taking cognizance on such matter.

4. In this regard, it is worth to refer a decision of this Court on the same point reported in Shankare Gowda @ Shankara Vs. State by Madanayakanahalli Police Station, Bengaluru and Another, ILR









Click Here to Read the rest of this document

1
2
3
4
5
6
7
8
9
10
11
SupremeToday Portrait Ad
supreme today icon
logo-black

An indispensable Tool for Legal Professionals, Endorsed by Various High Court and Judicial Officers

Please visit our Training & Support
Center or Contact Us for assistance

qr

Scan Me!

India’s Legal research and Law Firm App, Download now!

For Daily Legal Updates, Join us on :

whatsapp-icon telegram-icon
whatsapp-icon Back to top