SupremeToday Landscape Ad
Back
Next
Judicial Analysis Court Copy Headnote Facts Arguments Court observation
judgment-img

2018 Supreme(Kar) 659

DINESH MAHESHWARI, R.DEVDAS
RAJENDRA SHETTY – Appellant
Versus
STATE OF KARNATAKA – Respondent


Advocates:
Advocate Appeared:
For the Appellant :SRI. AZHAR MEER, ADVOCATE)
For the Respondent: SRI. S.H.PRASHANTH, Adv.

ORDER :

1. The petitioners are residents of Belle and Kattingeri Villages in the District of Udupi. The petitioners claim to be public spirited citizens engaged in public service and they are before this Court espousing a cause, which according to them is of general public interest.

2. The petitioners are aggrieved that Belle Gram Panchayat which was hitherto within the jurisdiction of Udupi Taluk, is now brought under the newly constituted Kapu Taluk. It is contended that Belle and Kattingeri were very well connected to Udupi and therefore the residents did not want to be brought under the newly formed Kapu Taluk. It is stated that a Taluk Agitation Committee was formed by the residents of Belle Gram Panchayat, to voice the opinion of the residents of the two villages. It is stated that memorandums were given to the concerned Deputy Commissioner and the Hon’ble Chief Minister of Karnataka, demanding non-exclusion of the two Villages from Udupi Taluk.

3. It is further contended that inspite of the agitation and repeated requests, by issuance of the impugned notification dated 18.01.2018, the State Government has removed the two Villages from the jurisdiction of Udupi Taluk and include










Click Here to Read the rest of this document

1
2
3
4
5
6
7
8
9
10
11
SupremeToday Portrait Ad
supreme today icon
logo-black

An indispensable Tool for Legal Professionals, Endorsed by Various High Court and Judicial Officers

Please visit our Training & Support
Center or Contact Us for assistance

qr

Scan Me!

India’s Legal research and Law Firm App, Download now!

For Daily Legal Updates, Join us on :

whatsapp-icon telegram-icon
whatsapp-icon Back to top