SupremeToday Landscape Ad
Back
Next
Judicial Analysis Court Copy Headnote Facts Arguments Court observation
Listen Audio Icon Pause Audio Icon
judgment-img

2017 Supreme(Kar) 1425

K.N.PHANEEDRA
Gangaraju – Appellant
Versus
State – Respondent


Advocates Appeared:
For the Appellant :Shri. M. Narayan, Advocate.
For the Respondents: Sri. K Nageshwarappa, H.C.G.P.

JUDGMENT :

K.N. PHANEEDRA, J.

1. This appeal is preferred against the judgment of conviction and sentence passed by the Fast Track Court-II at Chintamani in SC No. 88/2009, dated 30.07.2010 in convicting the accused Nos. 1, 2 and 4 for the offence punishable under Section 498A of I.P.C.

2. The above said accused persons were acquitted by the Trial Court for the offences under Sections 304B and 306 of I.P.C. and under Sections 3, 4 and 6 of D.P. Act. The Trial Court has sentenced the appellants-accused Nos. 1, 2 and 4 for the offence punishable under Section 498-A to undergo simple imprisonment for two years and to pay fine of Rs. 2,000/- each in default of payment of fine, they shall undergo 1/4th of the substantive sentence awarded to them.

3. Before adverting to the grounds urged by the learned Counsel for the appellants, it is just and necessary for this Court to have a brief factual matrix of this case.

The Deputy Superintendent of Police, ADC, CID, Bengaluru has submitted a charge-sheet after thorough investigation against the accused for the offences punishable under Sections 3, 4 and 6 of D.P. Act and also under Sections 498A, 306 and 304B of I.P.C. The allegations made agains




























Click Here to Read the rest of this document

1
2
3
4
5
6
7
8
9
10
11
SupremeToday Portrait Ad
supreme today icon
logo-black

An indispensable Tool for Legal Professionals, Endorsed by Various High Court and Judicial Officers

Please visit our Training & Support
Center or Contact Us for assistance

qr

Scan Me!

India’s Legal research and Law Firm App, Download now!

For Daily Legal Updates, Join us on :

whatsapp-icon telegram-icon
whatsapp-icon Back to top