S.SUJATHA
A. Narayana Shetty – Appellant
Versus
T. S. Umadevi – Respondent
S. SUJATHA, J.
1. This petition is directed against the judgment and order passed by the XIX Additional Small Causes Judge, Bangalore, in HRC.No.311/2009.
2. Briefly stated, the facts are, the respondents herein had filed a HRC petition against the petitioner herein, seeking for eviction of the petitioner under Section 27(2)(a) and (r) of the Rent Act, 1999 (hereinafter referred to as ' the Act' , for brevity), in HRC No. 311/2009. It was the case of the respondents that the petition schedule property was required for the purpose of the fourth respondent who is running a business of ladies-fashion items. On service of notice, the petitioner had entered appearance and contested the petition. The court below, after analyzing the evidence on record, allowed the petition directing the petitioner herein to quit and deliver vacant possession of the petition schedule property to the respondents within four months, besides directing the petitioner herein, to pay arrears of rent from September, 2008 till the date of passing of the order, amounting to Rs. 9,080/-. Aggrieved by the same, the petitioner is before this court in this revision petition.
3. The learned counsel Shri. T. Mohanda
Login now and unlock free premium legal research
Login to SupremeToday AI and access free legal analysis, AI highlights, and smart tools.
Login
now!
India’s Legal research and Law Firm App, Download now!
Copyright © 2023 Vikas Info Solution Pvt Ltd. All Rights Reserved.