SupremeToday Landscape Ad
Back
Next
Judicial Analysis Court Copy Headnote Facts Arguments Court observation
Listen Audio Icon Pause Audio Icon
judgment-img

2017 Supreme(Kar) 1481

BUDIHAL R.B.
State – Appellant
Versus
K. C. Siyaz – Respondent


Advocates:
Advocate Appeared:
For the Appellant : Sri K. Nagaeshwrappa
For the Respondent: Sri N.K. Harish

ORDER :

Budihal R.B., J.

This is the revision petition preferred by the State, challenging the legality and correctness of the judgment and order of acquittal dated 24th March, 2007 passed by the JMFC Court at Madikeri in C.C.No.388/2005 and also the order dated 19th September, 2014, passed by the I Additional District and Sessions Judge, Kodagu at Madikeri in Crl. Appeal No.22/2008.

2. The Trial Court acquitted the respondents/ accused for the alleged offence under Section 379 read with Section 34 of IPC.

3. Brief facts of the prosecution case as per the complaint averments, that on 9.10.2004 at about 10.00 p.m., accused Nos. 1 to 4 with a common intention of committing theft have stolen two electric poles and three line wires installed to seven electric poles fixed at Korangala Reserve Forest. They have cut the electrical poles with axe blades and converted them into eight pieces and thereby, stolen the articles worth Rs.15,000/-. The accused persons have sold eight pieces of electric poles to CW4 and thereby, they have committed alleged offence. After investigation, IO filed the charge-sheet for the said offences.

To prove its case, the prosecution in all examined 8 witnesses as PWs








Click Here to Read the rest of this document

1
2
3
4
5
6
7
8
9
10
11
SupremeToday Portrait Ad
supreme today icon
logo-black

An indispensable Tool for Legal Professionals, Endorsed by Various High Court and Judicial Officers

Please visit our Training & Support
Center or Contact Us for assistance

qr

Scan Me!

India’s Legal research and Law Firm App, Download now!

For Daily Legal Updates, Join us on :

whatsapp-icon telegram-icon
whatsapp-icon Back to top