S.SUNIL DUTT YADAV
Ravindra Nayak – Appellant
Versus
Karnataka State Election Commission – Respondent
In Writ Petition Nos.44499/2018, 50796/2018 & 53609-53611/2018, 54664/2018, 43519/2018 and 44520/2018, the petitioners challenge the notification dated 10.08.2018 issued by the respondent–State stipulating the reservation for various Wards of the Mangaluru City Corporation in light of upcoming elections in March 2019.
2. The petitioners being aspirant candidates who intend to contest elections in various Wards contend that the notification dated 10.08.2018 is illegal and not in compliance with stipulations of the legislative enactment, the constitutional mandate as well as guidelines specifying reservation policy and matrix, issued on 02.02.2015 as per Government Order numbered G.O. No. 240 of 2013 (“Guidelines”).
3. It is contended that Article 243T of the Constitution of India mandates reservation of seats for Scheduled Castes and Scheduled Tribes in every Municipality (as defined under Article 243Q of the Constitution of India) and that these seats should be allotted by rotation to different constituencies in a Municipality. The Guidelines, it is submitted, have been pa
Dr. Krishna Murthy and Others v. Union of India and Another
His Holiness Kesavananda Bharti Sripadagalvaru v. State of Kerala and another
Karnataka State Election Commission, Bangalore v. G.Sangappa and Others
Kishansing Tomar v. Municipal Corporation of the City of Ahmedabad & Others
L. Chandra Kumar v. Union of India and Others
Mohindhr Singh Gill v. Chief Election Commissioner
Sant Lal Gupta and others v. Modern Cooperative Group Housing Society Ltd. and Others
Login now and unlock free premium legal research
Login to SupremeToday AI and access free legal analysis, AI highlights, and smart tools.
Login
now!
India’s Legal research and Law Firm App, Download now!
Copyright © 2023 Vikas Info Solution Pvt Ltd. All Rights Reserved.