SupremeToday Landscape Ad
Back
Next
Judicial Analysis Court Copy Headnote Facts Arguments Court observation
Listen Audio Icon Pause Audio Icon
judgment-img

2018 Supreme(Kar) 861

IN THE HIGH COURT OF KARNATAKA AT BENGALURU
B. VEERAPPA, J.
MR. ASIF ALI SHAIKH HUSSAIN S/O LATE SHAIKH HUSSAIN - Appellant
Vs.
THE STATE OF KARNATAKA - Respondent
WRIT PETITION No.48995 of 2018 (GM-WAKF)
Decided on : 12-12-2018

Advocates:
Advocate Appeared:
For the Appellant :SRI JAYAKUMAR S PATIL, FOR SRI MAHAMMED TAHIR A., ADVOCATE
For the Respondent:SRI T.S. MAHANTESH, SMT. S.R. ANURADHA, SRI G. NATARAJ, SRI D.N. NANJUNDA REDDY, SENIOR COUNSEL FOR SRI A.S. KULKARNI, ADVOCATE, SRI G. KRISHNAMURTHY, SENIOR COUNSEL FOR SRI P. USMAN ADVOCATE

Headnote:

Waqf Act, 1995 - Section 14(1)(b)(iii) - Karnataka Municipal Corporations Act, 1976 - Section 23 - Karnataka Municipalities Act, 1964 - Section 14 - Karnataka Waqf Rules- 2017 - Rule 11 (3) – Election - Writ of certiorari - Quash of Order - Composition of Board - Bar Council (Karnataka State) for membership of Karnataka State Board of Auqaf - Whether petitioner has made out a prima-facie case to interfere with impugned order passed by 3rd respondent - Petitioner that election to 4th respondent - Karnataka State Bar Council was conducted and petitioner is the only Muslim candidate who has been declared as elected out of 25 members of the 4th respondent Bar Council and his name appeared at serial No.12 in result sheet - He being elected as member of 4th respondent - Bar Council has made an application under Form No.20 to Bar Council Electoral College - Held, It is clear that Board shall consist of a Chairperson AND one and not more than two members, as State Government may think fit, to be elected from each of electoral colleges - Admittedly State Government/concerned authority has not notified schedule of election to four electoral colleges mentioned in clause (b) of subsection 1 of Section 14 of Waqf Act, indicating date of commencement and completion of election, which shall not be less than 30 days and Returning Officer has not issued calendar of events - Therefore matter requires reconsideration, as 3rd respondent while passing impugned order has not considered amended provisions of Section 14(1)(b)(iii) of Waqf Act which came into effect on 1.11.2013 and also provisions of Rule 11 of Rules 2017 - Writ petition is allowed

ORDER :

The petitioner filed the present writ petition for a writ of certiorari to quash the order dated 16.10.2018 passed by the 3rd respondent in Case No.ELN/CR/44(14)/2018-19 as per Annexure-L and the writ of mandamus directing the 3rd respondent to permit the petitioner to vote, contest and participate in the upcoming Election of Karnataka State Board of Auqaf under the category of Muslim member of the Bar Council (Karnataka State) for membership of Karnataka State Board of Auqaf as per Section 14(1)(b)(iii) of the Waqf Act, 1995 by including the name of the petitioner in the final voters’ list at Annexure-M.

I Facts of the Case

2. It is the case of the petitioner that election to the 4th respondent - Karnataka State Bar Council was conducted on 27.3.2018 and petitioner is the only Muslim candidate who has been declared as elected out of 25 members of the 4th respondent Bar Council and his name appeared at serial No.12 in the result sheet - Annexure-A dated 7.7.2018. He being elected as the member of the 4th respondent - Bar Council has made an application under Form No.20 to the Bar Council Electoral College on 7.8.2018. In pursuance of the said application, the 4th respondent - Bar Council has registered the name of the petitioner in the Electoral College of the 4th respondent - Bar Council as a Muslim Member and also issued Form No. 21C. It is further contended that the 3rd respondent being Electoral Registration Officer to the election of the Respondent No.2 - Karnataka State Board of Auqaf has issued notification dated 3.8.2018 calling eligible persons to get themselves registered as voters of Respondent No.2 Board on or before 9.8.2018.

3. The petitioner submitted application for registration of his name as a sitting Muslim Member of the Bar Council of Karnataka as contemplated under Section 14(1)(b)(iii) of the Waqf Act, 1995. In pursuance of the said application made by the petitioner, the 3rd respondent - Electoral Registration Officer has entered the name of the petitioner in the Draft Electoral College of Muslim Member of the Karnataka State Bar Council. The Respondent No.5 filed objections for the enrolment of the membership of the petitioner in the category of sitting member of the Bar Council of Karnataka on the ground that the Hon’ble Supreme Court in its order dated 23.3.2018 in Transferred Case Civil No.(S) 126/2015 has held that the results of the election to the Bar Council cannot be published in the official gazette until all the complaints which are pending before the election tribunal are disposed of.

4. It is further contended that based on the objections filed by the 5th respondent, the 3rd respondent issued notice dated 29.9.2018 directing the petitioner to appear before him on 6.10.2018 for consideration of the objections filed. In response to the said notice, the petitioner filed reply to the objections filed by the 5th respondent before the 3rd respondent contending that the petitioner has already submitted a communication issued by the Karnataka State Bar Council, wherein it is stated that elections held on 27.3.2018 and results were declared on 27.6.2018. The petitioner further specifically pleaded that he is the lone Muslim member elected to the Karnataka State Bar Council and his name is found at serial No.12 in the result sheet - Annexure-A. Therefore his name was rightly enrolled in the draft voters list in the constituency of the Muslim Member of the Bar Council as contemplated under Section 14(1)(b)(iii) of the Waqf Act, 1995.

5. The petitioner further contended before the 3rd respondent that the objections raised by the 5th respondent with reference to the order dated 23.3.2018 passed by the Hon’ble Supreme Court to the effect that “the result of the members will also be declared; But the results will not be sent for publication in the official gazette and will not attain finality, unless the concerned tribunal finally approves the said result after holding enquiry, if any into the complaints




































































Click Here to Read the rest of this document

1
2
3
4
5
6
7
8
9
10
11
SupremeToday Portrait Ad
supreme today icon
logo-black

An indispensable Tool for Legal Professionals, Endorsed by Various High Court and Judicial Officers

Please visit our Training & Support
Center or Contact Us for assistance

qr

Scan Me!

India’s Legal research and Law Firm App, Download now!

For Daily Legal Updates, Join us on :

whatsapp-icon Back to top